NCT Number: NCT03338517
Helium-Neon Laser Therapy Versus Infrared Laser Therapy in Treating Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Background: Diabetic patients are frequently showed with foot ulceration as a common complication which increases to 20% in admission. Low-level laser therapy is used to control foot ulcer, but there is very limited data to compare the effects of Helium-Neon Laser therapy (HNLT) and Infrared Laser therapy (ILT) on diabetic foot ulcer.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of (HNLT) and (ILT) on diabetic foot ulcer.
Methods: Sixty-five patients with diabetic foot ulcer (51 males and 14 females) aged 50-60years. The participants were classified randomly to two groups, Helium-Neon Laser therapy (HNLT) and Infrared Laser therapy (ILT) groups. HNLT group received medical treatment with Helium-Neon Laser therapy and ILT group received medical treatment with Infrared Laser therapy for 8 weeks. Ulcer surface area was assessed using a sheet of cellophane paper at the beginning of the study, after four weeks, and after eight weeks at the end of the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
The study was carried out after obtaining ethical approval from the Department of surgery, Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt. Patients with varying stages of diabetic foot ulcers in the hospital were screened and included in the study. 65 diabetic patients with Grade I and II ulcers were selected according to Wagner classification, ages ranged between 50 to 60 years of age, BMI of 30 free from any metabolic-related medical conditions such as nephropathy, cardiomyopathy, recent myocardial infarction and pulmonary problems. Patients were randomized into two groups; Group (I) who received medical treatment with Helium-Neon Laser therapy (HNLT), (ASA Medical laser device (manufactured by ASA Terza- Via Alessandro, Italy) and Group (II) who received medical treatment with Infrared Laser therapy (ILT), (PHYACTION 792/796 manufactured in The Netherlands by Uniphy BV). The nature of the therapy was described and explained to the patient. A written informed consent was obtained prior to implementation of the study. Patients were subjected to detailed medical examination. Glucosylated Homoglobin (HbA1c) was obtained for patient screening.
Outcome measures Ulcer surface area was calculated by getting the impression of the ulcer floor using a sheet of cellophane paper. The imprint of the ulcer floor is transferred to graphing paper where ulcer size was plotted and diameter was recorded. Ulcer size was measured at the beginning of the study, after 4 weeks, and after 8 weeks at the end of study.
The position of patient was a comfortable position with disclosure of the affected foot. Transparent plastic films were double sterilized and directly placed flat and connected to the skin at the ulcer area with nullifing any motion or misrepresentation of the affected foot. The margins of the ulcer were followed by the same investigator to set up the measurements reliability16.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- patients with Grade I and II ulcers were selected according to Wagner classification ages ranged between 50 to 60 years of age, BMI of 30
Exclusion criteria
- nephropathy, cardiomyopathy, recent myocardial infarction and pulmonary problems
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Ulcer surface area
Time frame: 6 months
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Ahlia University
Other
Collaborators
- Cairo University
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Helium-Neon Laser Therapy and Infrared Laser Therapy in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Nov 9, 2017
- Registry last updated
- Nov 9, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Efficacy and Safety of AEYE Diagnostic Screening (AEYE-DS) Software Device for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy From Digital Funduscopic Images
NCT06241664
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsA Phase 3 Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Of 0.3 MG Pegaptanib Sodium To Sham Injections In Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT01100307
Diabetic Mellitus, Eye Diseases
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsEvaluating the Effect of Blue m Gel on Healing of Palatal Donor Site Versus Using Diode Laser
NCT07651423
Free Gingival Graft, LASER
Gamasa, Dakhalia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsPhotobiomodulation, Cryotherapy Combined With Compression, and Massage for Recovery
NCT05627141
Fatigue, LASER
Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
View Trial Details