Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27707, United States
NCT Number: NCT03843190
The first phase of the study is a feasibility survey of eligible participants, completed prior to initiating the intervention. The intervention consists of a 6-month 1:1 randomized trial with a waitlist control that recruits 120 older AA women. The rationale for these aims is that the successful completion is expected to provide evidence that a community-based, peer-led weight loss program with a national infrastructure can help a vulnerable, underserved population lose weight and improve their physical function. For older, obese, frail individuals, this could improve their CVD risk factors, quality of life, enhance their health; reduce their healthcare utilization, illness, and disability; and decrease their adverse geriatric outcomes. After completing these aims, the investigators expect that they will have proven that the community-based, peer-led weight loss program can improve both weight and physical function among older, obese AA women. This also could help other demographic groups with obesity and poor physical function. Eventually, it could help older adults maintain their health and independence in the community
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year–99 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Durham, North Carolina, 27707, United States
Older African American (AA) women have the highest prevalence of both obesity and frailty. In academic, expert-led interventions, obese, frail, older individuals both lost weight and improved their physical function. However, because of high personnel costs and nonexistent nationwide infrastructure, large-scale implementation of these interventions is impractical. The long-term goals are to eliminate the health disparities of obesity and frailty in older AA women. This proposal's overall objective is to determine the effects of a low-cost, community-based, peer-led weight loss program with a national infrastructure on obesity, physical function, and healthcare utilization in older AA women. To treat obesity and frailty in older AA women, it is critical to test a weight loss intervention that 1) has preliminary evidence of benefit; 2) is acceptable to older AA women; 3) is affordable; and 4) can be broadly disseminated. Take Off Pounds Sensibly (TOPS) is a national, nonprofit, community-based, peer-led weight loss program that meets these criteria. First, the applicant's retrospective database analyses of TOPS showed two important results: 1) Participants who renew their annual membership lose and maintain significant weight loss (SWL) for up to 7 years; and 2) Compared to their younger counterparts, older women are more likely to achieve SWL. Second, the applicant started three TOPS chapters for older AA women in a successful pilot study. Though the study ended in 2012, one of the chapters is still active almost 6 years later. Third, TOPS is affordable; it only costs $120 annually. Finally, TOPS has a nationwide infrastructure with chapters in all 50 states. Since obese, frail, older individuals in academic, expert-led weight loss interventions can improve their physical function, the central hypothesis is that a low cost, community-based, peer-led weight loss program with a national infrastructure can provide SWL, improved physical function, and lower healthcare utilization for AA women, an underserved, vulnerable population. The rationale for the proposed research is that TOPS and academic, expert-led weight loss interventions share components critical to successful weight loss; therefore, TOPS can deliver similar outcomes. The central hypothesis will be tested by pursuing the following aims in obese, frail, older AA women: Determine the effect of TOPS on 1) weight change and cardiovascular disease risk factors; 2) physical function and quality of life; and 3) healthcare utilization. This project is innovative because it uses a "community to academia" approach to treat the health disparities; our study population focuses on older AA women with decreased physical function; our outcomes focus on weight, physical function, and healthcare utilization; and our unique study settings. The proposed research is significant because determining the real-world effectiveness of the TOPS program and its impact on weight, physical function, and healthcare utilization in AA women can have a widespread impact on the older population at large. Thus, it has the potential to reduce adverse geriatric outcomes among all older individuals.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Conditional Inclusion Criteria:
Participants with type 2 diabetes on insulin or sulfonylureas will be allowed to participate in the study only if their providers agree to manage the changing medications requirements associated with possible weight loss by signing a "Permission to Participate" form. It is important to include patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin and sulfonylureas because these participants can benefit greatly from weight loss.
Exclusion criteria
Dietitian-facilitated classes
At end of study, offered peer-led classes to attend.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Percent of body weight change over 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Percentage of hemoglobin that is coated with glucose. A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability, i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Number of primary care visits reported by participant in last month (baseline) or since last study visit (3 and 6 months).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Number of participants reporting emergency department visit(s) in last month (baseline) or since last study visit (3 and 6 months).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Number of participants reporting hospitalization(s) in last month (baseline) or since last study visit (3 and 6 months).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is an objective measurement instrument of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults. Scores range from zero to 12 possible points. Lower scores are associated with lower function.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
The 8-foot up-and-go test is a timed test that measures balance, agility, and speed while walking or moving. Higher times are associated with worse physical function.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Decreased grip strength is a predictor of adverse outcomes in older adults.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Decreased grip strength is a predictor of adverse outcomes in older adults.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Counts the number of times a participant goes from sitting to standing in 30 seconds. Tests leg strength and endurance. Higher number associated with higher leg strength and endurance.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measures distance walked in 6 minutes and assesses aerobic capacity and endurance. Higher number indicates higher aerobic capacity and endurance.
Duke University
Other
Changes in Weight and Physical Function for Older African American Women in a National, Nonprofit, Community-Based, Peer-Led, Weight Loss Program
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00687115
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05184361
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Cruz Quebrada, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT05424081
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05104450
Apnea, Behavior
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial Details