Health and Healing Research Education and Service, Inc.
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
NCT Number: NCT04991844
The Healthy Eating for Successful Living in Older Adults™ (HESL) is a six-week community nutrition and lifestyle education program designed specifically for the elderly (>60 years), to promote dietary and behavioral changes towards a healthy lifestyle. The intervention was evaluated using a randomized-controlled trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
The elderly are at a higher risk of various chronic diseases. The burden of various chronic diseases such as heart disease and osteoporosis can be reduced with change in dietary and other lifestyle behaviors. The Healthy Eating for Successful Living in Older Adults™ (HESL) provides elderly with needed knowledge on healthy food choices and lifestyle behaviors, and tools that support behavioral changes. The investigators aimed to evaluate this intervention program by determining, among others, the impact of the intervention on factors such as dietary intake of fiber, and other nutrients, as well as healthy behaviors and food choices, and quality of life at 6 months post-intervention, using a randomized-controlled trial. The intervention group was compared to the control group receiving no intervention to evaluate the effects of the six-week HESL intervention on our outcome measures of interest.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intervention group participants met once a week, for 2.5 hours, over a period of six weeks for the HES workshops. The HES workshops followed a scripted curriculum that incorporated information from the USDA's MyPlateTM, and the USDA 2015-2020 dietary guidelines. Participants were also taught goal-setting, problem-solving through brainstorming, group support, self-assessment and management of dietary and physical activity patterns.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary fiber intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary saturated fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary polyunsaturated fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary monounsaturated fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary trans fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary cholesterol intake (mean intake in mg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary omega-3 fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary omega-6 fat intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary calcium intake (mean intake in mg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline dietary vitamin D intake (mean intake in IU/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline folate intake (mean intake in mcg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline potassium intake (mean intake in mg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline magnesium intake (mean intake in mg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline vitamin B6 intake (mean intake in mg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline vitamin B12 intake (mean intake in mcg/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline fruit intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline vegetable intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline legume intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline whole grain intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline nut and seed intake (mean intake in g/day) at 6 months using the Willett FFQ
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline physical activity (metabolic equivalent task (MET)-hours per week ) at 6 months using the Harvard Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline Body mass index (calculated from: weight in kilograms, and height in meters; weight and height will be combined to report BMI, Kg/m2) at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from baseline quality of life measure at 6 months using the Euro-QoL-5D-5L questionnaire; Participants were asked to provide a rating of their own health on a scale of 0-100, where 0 means "death" and 100 means "the best health.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally in a Likert scale from always to never with five categories. We converted responses into dummy variables (with 1=always, most of the time, or sometimes; and 0 =rarely and never).
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally in a Likert scale from always to never with five categories. We converted responses into dummy variables (with 1=always, most of the time, or sometimes; and 0 =rarely and never).
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally in a Likert scale from always to never with five categories. We converted responses into dummy variables (with 1=always, most of the time, or sometimes; and 0 =rarely and never).
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally in a Likert scale from always to never with five categories. We converted responses into dummy variables (with 1=always, most of the time, or sometimes; and 0 =rarely and never).
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally on a scale of 0-10, with 10 being most confident. These ratings were coded as 1 if they were 6 and above, and 0 if 5 or below.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally on a scale of 0-10, with 10 being most understandable/useful. These ratings were coded as 1 if they were 6 and above, and 0 if 5 or below.
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in response (in percentage points) to the above question at 6 months; questions were originally on a scale of 0-10, with 10 being most active. These ratings were coded as 1 if they were 6 and above, and 0 if 5 or below.
Health and Healing Research Education and Service, Inc.
Other
Healthy Eating for Successful Living in Older Adults™ Community Education Program
Acronym: HES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06916247
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05574699
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04264897
Aging, Chronic Disease
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial Details