MBSR Program
BehavioralMindfulness-based stress reduction, as described previously.
Other names: Mindfulness Program
NCT Number: NCT02624193
Preliminary data from the investigators' National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)-funded R21 on mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in HIV-infected youth suggest an association between mindfulness and improved self-regulation and medication adherence. This randomized, controlled trial will help the investigators to better understand the specific impact of MBSR on HIV medication and treatment adherence in HIV-infected youth, and the efficacy of MBSR in the amelioration of stress and improved self-regulation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–24 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Johns Hopkins Harriet Lane Clinic, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Despite remarkable advances in HIV medication effectiveness, adherence to HIV treatment recommendations is alarmingly poor, resulting in preventable morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that 26-72% of HIV-infected adolescents are non-adherent to their HIV medications and 22-33% are non-adherent with scheduled health care visits. HIV treatment non-adherence puts individuals at markedly increased risk for illness related to HIV itself and a variety of opportunistic infections, as well as at increased risk of spreading HIV.
Preliminary data from the investigators' NCCAM-funded R21 on mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in HIV-infected youth suggest an association between mindfulness and improved medication adherence, as well as enhanced self-regulatory processes (coping, psychological function, and cognitive function). This two-armed randomized, controlled trial will help the investigators to better understand the specific impact of MBSR on HIV medication and treatment adherence in HIV-infected youth, and the efficacy of MBSR in the amelioration of stress and improved self-regulation.
The aims of the study are as follows:
Primary Objective
Investigators hypothesize that MBSR vs. active control program (HT) participation will be associated with:
Secondary Objectives
Investigators also hypothesize that MBSR vs. active control program (HT) participation will be associated with:
Investigators will also explore:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
for supplement study:
Mindfulness-based stress reduction, as described previously.
Other names: Mindfulness Program
Health education curriculum, as described previously
Other names: Healthy Topics Program
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on treatment adherence as measured by the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network (ATN) HIV Medication Adherence self-report measure, as well as CD4 and viral load counts pulled from the participant's medical record. The measure and medical record data collection takes place at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on emotion regulation measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Specific NIH emotion measures are: meaning & purpose, positive affect, anger, fear, perceived hostility, sadness.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on thoughts of illness measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on issues in emotion regulation measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on mindfulness measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on multiple aspects of mindfulness measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on frequency of emotions (specifically, self-hostility, shame, shyness, and guilt) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on anger expression measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on trauma symptoms measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on self-compassion measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on perceived stress measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on risky sexual behavior measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on self-acceptance of lesbian/gay/bisexual identity measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on general health measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on quality of life measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on coping measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on coping responses measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on cognitive functioning measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
Assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on emotion-based cognitive functioning measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow-up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on emotion expressivity (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on management of anger, sadness, happiness, pride, and worry (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on the frequency of emotions, specifically disgust, joy, sadness, surprise, contempt, interest, fear, and anger, (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on emotion regulation (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on emotion approach coping (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on stress response, and inhibitory control and attention (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on stress response, and working memory (by gender) measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on stress response, and cognitive flexibility, measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on stress response, and episodic memory measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, and follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months
For those selected to be in the supplement study, assessment of impact of MBSR versus HT on stress response measured at baseline, post-program (3-month follow up), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Johns Hopkins University
Other
Improving Treatment Adherence in HIV-Positive Youth Through Mindfulness Training
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05358795
Adolescent Behavior, Adolescent Development
Ndola, Copperbelt, Zambia
View Trial DetailsNCT03574129
Adolescent Behavior, Adolescent Development
Nairobi, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT06913660
AIDS, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Kisumu, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT03086655
Behavior, HIV
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
View Trial Details