Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07557875

Healing Efficacy of Diode Laser in Lingual Frenectomy

This study aims to compare the wound healing efficacy and postoperative experiences between the 940 nm diode laser technique and the traditional electrosurgery method for treating ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) in children aged 3 to 6 years.

Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: Experimental Group - Patients undergo lingual frenectomy using a 940 nm diode laser and Active Comparator Group - Patients undergo the procedure using conventional high-frequency electrosurgery.

The study evaluates several key outcomes at multiple intervals (24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month post-surgery), including: (1) Wound Healing: Measured by the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS); (2) Pain Levels: Assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale; (3) Bleeding Control: Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding; (4) Tongue Mobility: Measurement of free tongue length according to Kotlow's classification.

The goal is to determine if the diode laser provides superior healing, less pain, and better bleeding control compared to electrosurgery.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

3 year–6 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital 1, Department of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Participant Allocation: Participants meeting the inclusion criteria (aged 3-6, diagnosed with Kotlow grade 3 or 4 ankyloglossia) are randomly assigned to one of two groups using a simple randomization method (drawing lots):

  • Group 1 (Laser Group): Lingual frenectomy performed using a 940 nm Diode Laser (Epic X, Biolase) with a power of 1W (average) and 2W (peak) in pulsed mode (CP2).
  • Group 2 (Electrosurgery Group): Lingual frenectomy performed using a high-frequency electrosurgical unit (ERBE-VIO 100C) in continuous contact mode.

Surgical Procedure: Both groups follow a standardized surgical protocol:

  • Anesthesia: Local anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine/Adrenaline (0.45 ml).
  • Technique: Transverse incision without suturing or muscle dissection to release the lingual frenum.
  • Safety Measures: Use of protective eyewear for the laser group and electrode grounding pads for the electrosurgery group.

Data Collection and Blinding:

  • Blinding: This is a single-blind study where the participants and their guardians are unaware of the assigned treatment group. The evaluator measuring post-operative outcomes is also blinded to the surgical method used.
  • Follow-up Schedule: Evaluations are conducted at five specific intervals:
  • Baseline (T0): Pre-operative measurements.
  • Post-operative: At 24 hours (T1), 3 days (T2), 1 week (T3), and 1 month (T4).

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Wound Healing: Assessed by the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS), focusing on re-epithelialization (CSR), haemostasis (CSH), and inflammation (CSI).
  • Pain Intensity: Self-reported by patients using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.
  • Tongue Function: Measuring the increase in free tongue length (mm) using a Quick Tongue-Tie (QTT) tool.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 3 and 6 years.
  • Diagnosed with grade 3 or grade 4 ankyloglossia according to Kotlow's classification (1999).
  • Parents or legal guardians provide informed consent for the child to participate in the study.
  • Patients and guardians agree to follow the follow-up schedule (24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month post-surgery).

Exclusion criteria

  • History of allergy to local anesthetics (e.g., Lidocaine, Adrenaline).
  • Patients with systemic diseases or high-risk surgical factors (e.g., cardiovascular disease, bleeding disorders, hemophilia, epilepsy, or uncontrolled asthma).
  • Uncooperative patients who are unable to undergo the procedure under local anesthesia or fail to follow post-operative instructions.
  • Patients who withdraw from the study before completion.

Treatment and study plan

Lingual Frenectomy using 940nm Diode Laser

Procedure

Lingual frenectomy performed using a 940 nm Diode Laser (Epic X, Biolase). The laser is set to pulsed mode (CP2), average power 1W, and peak power 2W. The procedure involves a transverse incision to release the frenum without suturing. Protective eyewear is mandatory for the patient and surgical team.

Other names: Diode Laser Frenectomy, Laser-assisted Frenotomy

Lingual Frenectomy using High-frequency Electrosurgery

Procedure

Lingual frenectomy performed using a high-frequency electrosurgical unit (ERBE-VIO 100C). The procedure follows a standardized transverse incision protocol without suturing. A grounding pad (electrode) is applied to the patient's body to complete the circuit. This serves as the active comparator representing the conventional surgical method at the hospital.

Other names: Electrosurgical Frenectomy, Electrocautery Frenotomy

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Wound Healing Score (EHS)

    Time frame: 24 hours (T1), 3 days (T2), and 1 week (T3) post-surgery.

    The EHS is used to evaluate the early healing of periodontal soft tissue wounds. It is the sum of three components: Clinical Signs of Re-epithelialization (CSR), Clinical Signs of Haemostasis (CSH), and Clinical Signs of Inflammation (CSI). The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates better and faster wound healing (10 being perfect healing).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: 24 hours (T1), 3 days (T2), and 1 week (T3) post-surgery.

    Patients self-assess their pain levels using a scale of 6 faces representing different pain intensities. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with increments of 2 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10).

  2. Level of Intraoperative Bleeding

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure (T0)

    Bleeding is assessed during the surgical procedure and categorized into 2 levels: Grade 1 (No bleeding) and Grade 2 (Bleeding present, requiring local haemostatic measures like gauze pressure or laser/electrosurgery coagulation).

  3. Increase in Free Tongue Length

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 week (T3), and 1 month (T4) post-surgery.

    Measured as the distance (in mm) from the attachment of the lingual frenum on the ventral surface of the tongue to the tip of the tongue using a Quick Tongue-Tie (QTT) measurement tool.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Phong Dai Lam, PhD, DDS

CONTACT

[email protected]

(+84) 906312958

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Healing Efficacy of Diode Laser in Lingual Frenectomy

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.