Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00869648

Head Positions to Open the Upper Airway

Ventilation during basic life support improves survival in cardiac arrest patients significantly. Unfortunately, this is in contrast to the willingness of potential rescuers to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation. For example, although healthcare professionals would perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation on a 4-year old drowned child in >90% of cases, this likelihood would decrease to ~10% in the case of a young male unconscious patient in a San Francisco public bus. Possibly, lay rescuers would perform assisted ventilation more often if a simple ventilation device were available. However, both the willingness to perform assisted ventilation plus the ability to open and to maintain the airway patent are necessary to ensure efficient ventilation in an unconscious patient with an unprotected upper airway.

Since retention of skills after basic life support classes are notoriously low, a resuscitation tool should incorporate self-explanatory features to improve applicability, and to provide built-in safety. Thus, an option could be to ensure an open airway by the use of a built-in indicator within a ventilating device to confirm correct head extension. One possible approach may be to determine head position angles that make an open airway likely, and integrate these angles into a scale on a ventilating device; however, safe head extension needs to be determined first to prevent harm.

The purpose of this study is to determine head position angles and ventilation parameters reflecting neutral position, maximal extension and a position deemed optimal by an anaesthesiologist in patients undergoing anaesthesia induction for elective surgery in a first step to design a ventilating device to optimise ventilation of an unprotected upper airway. The investigators will ventilate 30 patients with a pillow under the head simulating ventilation in the operating theater, and 30 patients without a pillow under the head simulating ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Dentures will not be removed during assessment. After anaesthesia induction the head will be consecutively flexed in the three positions and measurements performed. Afterwards, general anaesthesia and surgery will ensue. The health risk for this extra minutes of mask ventilation is minimal.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences in head position angles and ventilation parameters.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA I and II

Exclusion criteria

  • Cervical spine pathologies
  • Peripheral nerve deficiencies
  • Body mass index >40kg/m2
  • Obvious primary or secondary craniofacial abnormalities

Treatment and study plan

Extension

Procedure

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in extension

Neutral head position

Procedure

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in neutral position

Anaesthesiologist's position

Procedure

after anaesthesia induction the head is placed in a position deemed optimal by the anaesthesiologist

Primary outcomes

  1. Head position angles

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after anaesthesia induction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tidal volume

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after anaesthesia induction

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University Innsbruck

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Head Positions to Open the Upper Airway- a Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Mar 26, 2009
Registry last updated
Mar 23, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.