hCT-MSC in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The primary outcome measure is the mean of the Socialization and Communication Subscale Standard Scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) from the Comprehensive Interview form. The primary endpoint is the change in this outcome measure from baseline to six months before the second infusion. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in socialization and communication. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The change in the Socialization Subscale Standard Scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) from baseline to six months. Higher Socialization Standard scores indicate greater socialization. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in socialization. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The change in the Communication Standard Scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) from the Comprehensive Interview form from baseline to six months before the second infusion. Higher scores indicate greater communication. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in communication. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The CGI-S Overall Score is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's overall functioning and symptoms of autism at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's experience with participants who have the same diagnosis. The clinician rates the severity of autism symptoms - 1, normal, no symptoms; 2, borderline level of symptoms; 3, mild symptoms; 4, moderate symptoms; 5, marked symptoms; 6, severe symptoms; or 7, extremely severe symptoms. The higher ratings indicate greater severity of overall functioning impairment.

The CGI-I Overall Score is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's autism overall functioning and symptoms have improved or worsened relative to a baseline assessment. The symptoms are rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. The lower scores indicate greater improvement.

The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales is a 5-minute parent questionnaire that measures the child's functioning in the dimensions of physical, emotional, social, and school. The items use a Likert rating scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost Always). This 0-4 scale is then transformed to 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0 for a reverse score. The Total Scale Score is then computed as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales for a total score range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

To assess safety, participants were considered according to the treatment received at each time point, not what they were randomized. Patients received the infusion to which they were randomized at baseline and the alternate treatment at 6 months. Therefore, adverse events are reported by randomized treatment arm broken into periods: 0-6 months (post-baseline infusion, pre-six month infusion) and 6-12 months (post-six month infusion).

To assess safety, participants were considered according to the treatment received at each time point, not to what they were randomized. Patients received the infusion to which they are randomized at baseline, and the alternate treatment at 6 months. AEs are reported by randomized treatment arm broken into periods: 0-6 months (post-baseline infusion, pre-six month infusion) and 6-12 months (post-six month infusion). 6-12 month evaluation time points are further broken into whether or not the participant received a second infusion, since three MSC patients and one Placebo patient did not receive the 6-month incentive infusion but were still evaluated.

Assess for anti-HLA antibodies

To assess safety, participants were considered according to the treatment received at each time point, not to what they were randomized. Patients received the infusion to which they are randomized at baseline, and the alternate treatment at 6 months. AEs are reported by randomized treatment arm broken into periods: 0-6 months (post-baseline infusion, pre-six month infusion) and 6-12 months (post-six month infusion). 6-12 month evaluation time points are further broken into whether or not the participant received a second infusion, since three MSC patients and one Placebo patient did not receive the 6-month incentive infusion but were still evaluated.

To assess safety, participants were considered according to the treatment received at each time point, not to what they were randomized. Patients received the infusion to which they are randomized at baseline, and the alternate treatment at 6 months. AEs are reported by randomized treatment arm broken into periods: 0-6 months (post-baseline infusion, pre-six month infusion) and 6-12 months (post-six month infusion). 6-12 month evaluation time points are further broken into whether or not the participant received a second infusion, since three MSC patients and one Placebo patient did not receive the 6-month incentive infusion but were still evaluated.

The change in the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) Adaptive Behavior Composite Subscale from baseline to 6 months before the second infusion. Higher Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard scores indicate greater adaptive behavior. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in adaptive behavior. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The change in the Daily Living Skills Subscale Standard Scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) from baseline to six months before the second infusion. Higher Daily Living Skills Standard scores indicate greater daily living skills. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in daily living skills. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The change in the Motor Skills Standard Scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-3) from the Comprehensive Interview form from baseline to six months before the second infusion. Higher scores indicate greater motor skills. A positive change in the scores indicates an improvement in motor skills. A standard score of 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers.

The change in the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) Social Withdrawal scale from baseline to six months before the second infusion. Higher scores indicate greater problems with social withdrawal. A positive change in the scores indicates a worsening in social withdrawal. This scale has 16 items that are scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 = not a problem, 1 = slight problem, 2 = moderately serious problem, 3 = severe problem. The individual items are added together to calculate the Social Withdrawal scale score.

The change in the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDDBI) from baseline to 6 months before the second infusion. The PDDBI is a measure of problem behaviors and social, language, and learning or memory skills of children who have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score has a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 points with a range of 10-100. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues and a positive change in score indicates worsening.

The change in the Autism Impact Measure (AIM) from baseline to 6 months before second infusion. AIM is a measure of core Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms. It is a parent-report questionnaire that includes 41 core-symptom items rated on two corresponding 5-point scales: frequency (ranging from "never" to "always") and impact (ranging from "not at all" to "severely") over the previous two weeks. Frequency and impact ratings are combined, yielding a total score range of 82 to 410. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity; a positive change in score indicates worsening of symptoms.

The change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Emotional Control subscale from baseline to month 6 before the second infusion. BRIEF is a survey that assesses executive function and self-regulation with the following subscales: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, and Planning and Organization. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dysfunction each respective domain. A positive change in score indicates worsening the respective domain. Raw scores for each domain are converted to t-scores (Mean = 50, SD = 10) and percentiles. T scores 60-64 are considered to be mildly elevated, 65-69 are considered to be potentially clinically elevated, and >= 70 are considered to be clinically elevated.

The change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Working Memory subscale from baseline to month 6 before the second infusion. The BREIF is a survey that assesses executive function and self-regulation with the following subscales: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, and Planning and Organization. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dysfunction each respective domain. A positive change in score indicates worsening the respective domain. Raw scores for each domain are converted to t-scores (Mean = 50, SD = 10) and percentiles. T scores 60-64 are considered to be mildly elevated, 65-69 are considered to be potentially clinically elevated, and >= 70 are considered to be clinically elevated.

The change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Inhibit subscale from baseline to month 6 before the second infusion. The BRIEF is a survey that assesses executive function and self-regulation with the following subscales: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, and Planning and Organization. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dysfunction each respective domain. A positive change in score indicates worsening the respective domain. Raw scores for each domain are converted to t-scores (Mean = 50, SD = 10) and percentiles. T scores 60-64 are considered to be mildly elevated, 65-69 are considered to be potentially clinically elevated, and >= 70 are considered to be clinically elevated.

The change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Plan/Organization subscale from baseline to month 6 before the second infusion. The BRIEF is a survey that assesses executive function and self-regulation with the following subscales: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, and Planning and Organization. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dysfunction each respective domain. A positive change in score indicates worsening the respective domain. Raw scores for each domain are converted to t-scores (Mean = 50, SD = 10) and percentiles. T scores 60-64 are considered to be mildly elevated, 65-69 are considered to be potentially clinically elevated, and >= 70 are considered to be clinically elevated.

The change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Shift subscale from baseline to month 6 before the second infusion. The BRIEF is a survey that assesses executive function and self-regulation with the following subscales: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, and Planning and Organization. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dysfunction each respective domain. A positive change in score indicates worsening the respective domain. Raw scores for each domain are converted to t-scores (Mean = 50, SD = 10) and percentiles. T scores 60-64 are considered to be mildly elevated, 65-69 are considered to be potentially clinically elevated, and >= 70 are considered to be clinically elevated.

The change in the Expressive Vocabulary Test (Third Edition, EVT-3) from baseline to 6 months before the second infusion. The EVT-3 is a measure of a participant's ability to match a spoken word with an image of an object, action, or concept. The number of words that are retrieved is converted to a Standard Score, where 100 is the mean with a standard deviation of 15 points. A score of 100 should be understood as being similar to the typical population of the same age. Scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low to low and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers. A positive change in EVT-3 score indicates improvement.