HBsAg RDT Women
Diagnostic TestHBsAg will be screened using finger-stick capillary blood during the ANC visit, simultaneously with the HIV test
NCT Number: NCT07054359
To achieve global elimination of hepatitis B virus (HBV), it is crucial to eliminate HBV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) by ensuring high coverage of birth dose vaccine and expanding the adoption of peripartum antiviral prophylaxis (PAP) by tenofovir. Current international guidelines require hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive pregnant women to undergo viral load (VL) quantification to identify those at high risk (VL ≥200,000 IU/mL) who should receive PAP. However, VL testing remains inaccessible in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in rural areas. Consequently, in the forthcoming guidelines, the WHO is going to issue a conditional recommendation for administering PAP to all HBsAg-positive women lacking access to VL testing. Although this universal strategy may appear promising for simplifying the diagnostic process, it may result in overtreating the majority of HBsAg-positive pregnant women, estimated at 85% in Africa and 70% in Asia, for whom birth dose vaccine is likely sufficient. Moreover, the real-world applicability of this strategy in LMICs has never been formally tested.
As an innovative alternative, the adoption of a rapid point-of-care test for hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg-RDT) is proposed to identify women eligible for PAP.This test requires only a drop of capillary blood, eliminating the need for electricity or centrifugation, and can provide a reliable result within 45 minutes. Compared to the universal strategy, HBcrAg-RDT strategy is expected to be less expensive and could prevent unnecessary tenofovir exposure for both women and their fetuses. Our aim is to establish the non-inferiority of the HBcrAg-RDT strategy, in comparison to the universal strategy, in terms of effectiveness, defined as the reduction in maternal VL at the time of childbirth, a main driver of the MTCT risk. This will be approached through a multidisciplinary framework integrating health economics, implementation science, and health policy analysis.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–50 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
I) Methodology and Study Design
The study combines two components:
I. Core Research Study Study Design Two-Arm Parallel, Cluster-Randomized Trial Design, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial 1:1 Allocation Ratio 1:1 Arm 1: Intervention Group (Selective Strategy) HBsAg-positive women → Tested for HBcrAg RDT → TDF treatment if HBcrAg positive.
Arm 2: Control Group (Universal Strategy) HBsAg-positive women → Immediate TDF treatment
Clusters Randomization unit: Primary Health Centers (PHCs) or rural hospitals Total clusters: 80 (40 per group, 16 clusters per country)
Participants Total participants: 3200 HBsAg-positive women 1600 women per group → 640 women per country → 40 per cluster
Key eligibility criteria for clusters include:
II. The Social Science component:
The social sciences component of the study will be conducted in only 2 countries (Cambodia and Ivory Coast) and includes three key sub-studies:
A mixed-methods approach will be used, including qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires among pregnant women and healthcare workers.
Additionally, a qualitative assessment of the two strategies' acceptability, alongside a health policy analysis, will be conducted in Togo to enrich the study's contextual understanding. This initiative will also enhance the partner team's social science research capacity through targeted training and skill development in qualitative research for students and early-career researchers.
II) Intervention:
Medication: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF); Administration Route: Oral Dosage: 300 mg/day or 300 mg every 2 days (if creatinine clearance is 30-50 ml/min)
Preventive treatment:
III) Statistical methods
Core research study. The investigators predict that with the universal strategy, the proportion of women meeting the primary endpoint would be 78%. They chose a non-inferiority margin of 10% when comparing the HBcrAg-RDT strategy to the universal strategy. This indicates that a 68% success rate would be accepted for the same primary endpoint under the worst-case HBcrAg-RDT strategy.
They plan to recruit 40 HBsAg-positive women in each PHC. With a coefficient of variation between clusters of 0.143, derived from the assumptions, the trial requires 40 clusters per group, totaling 80 clusters of 40 HBsAg-positive women each, for 90% power at two-sided 5% (2.5% one-sided) significance to show non-inferiority within a margin of 10%.
Social Science quantitative data:
The sample size for the social science data is based on the proportion of women with good knowledge of hepatitis B, 90% power, two-sided 5% significance, and 20% loss to follow-up at the 9-month postpartum visit. Assuming 23% and 29% of women having good knowledge of hepatitis B at inclusion and the 9-month postpartum visit, respectively, overall for both strategies, with a correlation coefficient before-after of 0.15, 32 clusters (16 per country) of 40 women each (totaling 1280 participants) will be needed to show significant differences in the proportion of women with good knowledge of hepatitis B between inclusion and the 9-month postpartum visit (overall, considering both strategies together).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The reported gestational age is ≥28 weeks, based on the last menstrual period (LMP) if known.
Fetal biometry (e.g., head circumference, femur length) on ultrasound suggests a gestational age of ≥28 weeks.
Symphysis-fundal height (SFH) measurement of ≥ 28 cm which corresponds to approximately 28 weeks of gestation.
HBsAg will be screened using finger-stick capillary blood during the ANC visit, simultaneously with the HIV test
300mg per day or 300 mg every 2 days (if créatinine clearance is 30-50ml/min)
300mg per day or 300 mg every 2 days (if créatinine clearance is 30-50ml/min)
The social sciences component only in Cambodia and Ivory Coast. 3 key sub-studies: i) a socio-economic and behavioral study ii) a health economic evaluation study, and iii) a health policy study.
A mixed-methods approach will be used, including qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires among pregnant women and healthcare workers
At 9 months, all infants will be tested for HBsAg; HBsAg-positive infants will undergo HBV DNA testing, and DBS will be collected for biobank storage.
Time frame: Delivery
The primary endpoint will be the percentage of HBsAg-positive women who present at healthcare facilities for delivery and have an HBV DNA <200,000 IU/mL at the time of delivery.
Time frame: At 9 months of life
Time frame: At screening
Time frame: up to 40 weeks of gestation
Time frame: from inclusion to delivery, max 40 weeks
Time frame: up to 9 months
Time frame: up to 9 months
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 27 months
Time frame: At 3 months postpartum
Time frame: At 3 months post-partum
Time frame: At inclusion and 3 months after delivery
Time frame: At 3-time points: inclusion, 6-8 weeks after delivery and 9 months after delivery
Minimum total score = 5 Maximum total score = 25
Low score:
Indicates low communicative literacy.
High score :
Reflects a good ability to interact effectively in a healthcare context
Time frame: At 3-time points: inclusion, 6-8 weeks after delivery and 9 months after delivery
Percentage of women who disclosed their HBV status to their partner and HBV disclosure score/moral support and discrimination scales
Time frame: At 3-time points: inclusion, 6-8 weeks after delivery and 9 months after delivery
Time frame: At 3-time points: inclusion, 6-8 weeks after delivery and 9 months after delivery
Time frame: Before HCW training and at the end of the study (18-24 month after the study starts)
Minimal total score= 0 Maximal total score= 100 Low score indicates low acceptability High score indicates high acceptability
Time frame: Before HCW training and at the end of the study (18-24 month after the study starts)
Declared preferences of HCW between theoretical scenarios exhibiting various characteristics (time to get a diagnostic in minutes, cost for women in dollars, specificity and sensibility of the test in percentage)
Time frame: until 9 months after delivery
Costs will be estimated based on a societal approach, including all expenses for the healthcare system and the costs (direct and indirect) for the women and their households, and will be estimated using a dedicated data collection tool administrated during the duration of the project, relying on a micro-costing approach (see section 3.2.2 of the protocol, Health Economic Evaluation).
Time frame: At the end of follow_up after 27 months
ICER wil be calculated as the difference in costs between the two strategies (incremental cost) divided by the difference in health benefits (infections avoided and mortality avoided between the two strategies). The ICER will be expressed as an additional cost (in dollars) per infection avoided.
Lower ICER indicates greater cost-effectiveness of the assessed strategy.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Olivier SEGERAL
CONTACT
Yusuke SHIMAKAWA
CONTACT
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
Other Gov
Acronym: HIPOCAMP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07137247
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07673068
HBV Infection
View Trial DetailsNCT07412977
Arbovirus Infections, Blood-Borne Infections
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07088133
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
View Trial Details