Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Recovery
Poznan, 61-871, Poland
NCT Number: NCT07254182
This randomized, parallel-group study looked at how a standard 15-minute ice pack applied to the back of the hand affects skin temperature and how cold and comfortable the hand feels, compared with a room-temperature water pack. Healthy young men were randomly assigned to one of the two groups during a single laboratory visit. Skin temperature was measured before, during, and after the application, and participants rated their thermal sensation (how cold/warm they felt) and overall comfort.
The main outcome was the change in hand skin temperature right after the 15-minute application. Additional outcomes included comfort and cold-feeling ratings and how quickly skin temperature returned toward baseline during recovery. This was a minimal-risk study; expected short-term effects included temporary cold, numbness, redness, or mild discomfort. No medicines or invasive procedures were used.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–30 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Poznan, 61-871, Poland
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Single 15-minute application of a reusable plastic Mueller ice bag (Ø 22.86 cm, 946 mL). The bag was filled with 400 g pre-portioned cylindrical ice and placed on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers. Participants were supine with the treated hand slightly elevated; ambient temperature and humidity were controlled (≈22.5 ± 1.0 °C; 55.3 ± 6.5% RH). Subjective thermal sensation/comfort (and pain) were recorded at minutes 7 and 15 during application. Arm: Experimental - Ice Pack
Identical 15-minute application using the same Mueller bag, filled with thermoneutral water (within ±0.5 °C of limb skin temperature), mass-matched to 400 g. Placement, posture, room conditions, and timing of subjective assessments (minutes 7 and 15) mirrored the experimental arm: bag on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers; participants supine with the hand slightly elevated. Arm: Active Comparator - Thermoneutral Water Pack.
Time frame: From immediately after pack removal (0 minutes; time point IV) to 30 minutes after pack removal (time point X).
Region-of-interest (ROI) mean skin temperature (Tsk; °C) on the dorsal hand measured with infrared thermography (IRT; FLIR SC640). The primary estimand is the between-group mean difference (Ice - Thermoneutral) in the nadir (minimum) across rewarming time points IV-X, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Lower values indicate greater cooling.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation) and at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after ice-pack removal.
Difference between infrared-thermography-derived skin temperature (TskIRT) and resistance temperature detector-derived skin temperature (TskRT), in degrees Celsius (°C), at each matched time point (I-X). IRT values represent ROI averages; resistance temperature (RT) values are point skin temperature readings from a RTD placed between the 3rd and 4th metacarpal bones. Positive values indicate that TskIRT is greater than TskRT. Between-group comparisons across time.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
MDT (g) via Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments using an up-down procedure; analysed as IV - I. Higher values indicate reduced tactile sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
VDT using a 64-Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork (0-8/8 scale); analysed as IV - I. Higher values indicate reduced vibration sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
9-point TSS (-4 very cold … +4 very hot) at I-IV; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III. Between-group comparison of peak and trajectory.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
5-point comfort scale (1 comfortable … 5 extremely uncomfortable) at I-IV; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III.
Time frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
0-100 mm visual analogue scale; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III.
Poznan University of Physical Education
Other
Effects of Ice-Pack Application on Hand Skin Temperature and Subjective Thermal Sensation and Comfort in Healthy Young Men: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Controlled Trial
Acronym: ICEHAND
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06223087
Behavior, Cold Exposure
Krakow, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06784531
Cold Exposure
Natick, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04738838
Cold Exposure
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05464758
Cold Exposure
Natick, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details