GWP42003-P
DrugOther names: Cannabidiol, CBD, Epidiolex
NCT Number: NCT02224703
To investigate the potential antiepileptic effects of cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in children and young adults with Dravet syndrome.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Heidelberg, Australia
This study was a 2:2:1:1 randomized, double-blind, 14-week comparison of two dose levels of GWP42003-P (10 milligram/kilogram [mg/kg]/day and 20 mg/kg/day) versus placebo (10 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent and 20 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent; presented as pooled placebo in the study). A 28-day screening period prior to randomization (to establish baseline parameters) preceded the treatment period, which consisted of a 2-week titration period followed by a 12-week maintenance period. The study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of GWP42003-P compared with placebo. 20 mg/kg/day was recommended by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) after assessment of safety and pharmacokinetic data from Part A of study GWEP1332 (NCT02091206). The first participant did not enroll into this study until the DSMC reviewed the safety data from Part A of study GWEP1332 (NCT02091206).
Following study completion, all participants were invited to continue to receive GWP42003-P in a separate open-label extension study (GWEP1415; NCT02224573).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Other names: Cannabidiol, CBD, Epidiolex
Other names: Placebo
Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or Early Termination (ET)
Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. The primary endpoint was analyzed using negative binomial regression on the sum of the convulsive seizure counts during the treatment period, based on the ITT analysis set. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in convulsive seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or ET
Total seizures were defined as the combination of convulsive and non-convulsive seizures. Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures. Non-convulsive seizures were defined as myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, or absence seizures. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures and non-convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Change compared to baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in total seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or ET
Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: ([frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline]/frequency during baseline) x 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) x 28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average).
Time frame: Baseline to Last Visit
On Day 1 (prior to receiving study drug), the caregiver was asked to write a brief description of the participant's overall condition as a memory aid for the CGIC questionnaire at subsequent visits. The CGIC questionnaire comprised the following question, to be rated on a 7-point scale: Since your child started treatment, please assess the status of your child's overall condition (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment) using the scale below. The markers were: "Very Much Improved"; "Much Improved"; "Slightly Improved"; "No Change"; "Slightly Worse"; "Much Worse"; "Very Much Worse". The CGIC response/score, recorded at each visit, was summarized, on both a categorical and continuous scale, by treatment group. The scores at the last scheduled visit (not including the end of taper or safety follow-up visits) at which participant's last evaluation was performed were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07176832
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Compiègne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02091375
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02091206
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02224573
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
View Trial Details