Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04870099

Guided Self-help for Common Mental Disorders

Common mental disorders (CMDs) like depression and anxiety account for a large proportion of disability worldwide. Access to effective treatments like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is limited and has not reduced the public health burden of psychopathology. For patients with mild-moderate CMDs, lower-intensity treatments like guided self-help CBT (GSH-CBT) are effective and more scalable (e.g., via the internet). The advent of social media has opened avenues for dissemination of GSH-CBTs and allows for passive sensing of mood, thinking, behavior, and social networks. We propose to leverage a social media platform used by over a fifth of the United States (Twitter) as a recruitment tool to virtually screen over 150 individuals, recruit N=60 to a 5-week course of GSH-CBT, and extract social media data from individuals engaged in GSH-CBT. Sociodemographic and social media data will be used to predict engagement, outcomes, and processes in GSH-CBT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Indiana University

Bloomington, Indiana, 47408, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least mild distress: K6 score ≥ 6
  • Having reasonably regular access to the internet or a telephone

Exclusion criteria

  • Suicidality: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) item 9 ("thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself ") ≥ 2 ("more than half the days")

Treatment and study plan

Doing What Matters in Times of Stress: An Illustrated Guide

Behavioral

From the WHO's website: Doing What Matters in Times of Stress: An Illustrated Guide is a stress management guide for coping with adversity. The guide aims to equip people with practical skills to help cope with stress. A few minutes each day are enough to practice the self-help techniques. The guide can be used alone or with the accompanying audio exercises.

Informed by evidence and extensive field testing, the guide is for anyone who experiences stress, wherever they live and whatever their circumstances.

Primary outcomes

  1. 6-week Change in Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6

    Changes in K6 from baseline to Week 6. The K6 is a measure of distress and the measure is scored on a scale of 0 - 24 where higher scores indicate higher distress (i.e., are negative). Thus, lower scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

  2. 6-week Change in the WHO 5 Well-being Index (WHO-5)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6

    Changes in WHO-5 from baseline to Week 6. The WHO-5 is a measure of well-being and the measure is scored on a scale of 0 - 100 where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with life (i.e., are positive). Thus, higher scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6-week Change in Emotion Regulation Scale (ERQ) - Reappraisal Subscale

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6

    Changes in the ERQ Reappraisal subscale from baseline to Week 6. The Reappraisal scale is a measure of regulating emotions by engaging in reappraisal (i.e., changing the one one thinks about an emotion evoking stimuli), widely considered an adaptive strategy. The measured is scored on a 1-7 scale where higher scores indicate greater use of adaptive emotion regulation strategies (i.e., positive). Thus, higher scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

  2. 6-week Change in the Emotion Regulation Scale (ERQ) - Suppression Subscale

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 6

    Changes in the ERQ Suppression Scale from baseline to Week 6. The ERQ Suppression scale is a measure of regulating emotions by engaging in suppression (i.e., trying not to think or feel), which is considered a maldaptive emotion regulation strategy. The measure is scored on a scale of 1 - 7 where higher scores indicate higher use of suppression (i.e., negative). Thus, lower scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

  3. 3-month Change in Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6; 0 - 24)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 Months post-treatment

    Changes in K6 from baseline to 3 months after the termination of the study. The K6 is a measure of distress and the measure is scored on a scale of 0 - 24 where higher scores indicate higher distress (i.e., negative). Thus, lower scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

  4. 3-month Change in the WHO 5 Well-being Index (WHO-5)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 Months post-treatment

    Changes in WHO-5 from baseline to 3 months after the termination of the study. The WHO-5 is a measure of well-being and the measure is scored on a scale of 0 - 100 where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with life (i.e., are positive). Thus, higher scores relative to baseline indicate more positive outcomes.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Official study title

Leveraging Computational Social Sciences and Natural Language Processing to Optimize Engagement and Response to Low-intensity CBT for Depression and Anxiety

Acronym: DWM

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
May 3, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.