Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03350282

Guanidinoacetic Acid With Creatine Compared With Creatine Alone for Tissue Bioenergetics, Hyperhomocysteinemia and Exercise Performance

Co-administration of creatine and guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) has been recently put forward as an advanced dietary strategy to optimize tissue bioenergetics. The investigators hypothesized that creatine-GAA mixture would result in more powerful rise in brain and skeletal muscle creatine, as compared to creatine supplementation alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Targeting energy-demanding tissues in health and disease continues to be a challenging task in human nutrition and biomedicine. Impaired bioenergetics accompanies many different conditions, including cardiometabolic diseases, neurodegenerative disorders or high-intensity exercise, with various dietary interventions developed to restore cellular energy. Creatine is recognized as a beneficial and safe energy-boosting agent in both athletic and clinical environments. However, its effectiveness in specific conditions seems to be fairly restrained due to its limits in transportability and performance. Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), a metabolic precursor of creatine, appears as a novel energy-enhancing supplement, with GAA being superior to creatine in facilitating creatine concentrations in the human brain and skeletal muscle. This perhaps happens due to GAA interaction with cellular transporters previously dismissed as untargetable carriers by other similar therapeutics. On the other hand, GAA loading remains under scrutiny due to its hyperhomocysteinemia-inducing potential, and possible neurotoxic effects. Co-administration of creatine and GAA has been recently proposed as a better strategy comparing to administration of each compound per se. Besides providing a competitive advantage for enhanced levels of tissue creatine, GAA-creatine mixture might also diminish side effects related to isolated GAA administration. However, no human studies so far evaluated the effects of this mixture. In the present study, the investigators compared the impact of 4-week co-administration of GAA and creatine vs. creatine administration alone on serum biomarkers, exercise performance and tissue bioenergetics in healthy young men.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • men age 18-45 years
  • BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2
  • physically active (> 150 min per week)
  • free of known disease
  • must be able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • serum homocysteine > 15 µmol/L
  • use of dietary supplement (> 1 month)

Treatment and study plan

GAA-creatine

Dietary Supplement

Creatine

Dietary Supplement

Primary outcomes

  1. Brain creatine

    Time frame: Baseline vs 4-week follow up

    Rise in brain creatine levels

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vastus medialis creatine

    Time frame: Baseline vs 4-week follow up

    Rise in vastus medialis creatine creatine levels

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Guanidinoacetic Acid With Creatine Compared With Creatine Alone for Tissue Bioenergetics, Hyperhomocysteinemia and Exercise Performance: a Randomized Double-blind Superiority Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 22, 2017
Registry last updated
May 4, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.