Guadecitabine
DrugOther names: SGI-110
NCT Number: NCT02907359
A Phase 3, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guadecitabine in participants with MDS or CMML who failed or relapsed after adequate prior treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, or both. This global study will be conducted in approximately 15 countries. Approximately 408 participants from approximately 100 study centers will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either guadecitabine (approximately 272 participants) or Treatment Choice (approximately 136 participants). The study consists of a 21-day screening period, a treatment period, a safety follow-up visit, and a long-term follow-up period. The study is expected to last more than 2 years, and the duration of individual participant participation will vary. Participants may continue to receive treatment for as long as they continue to benefit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study of guadecitabine vs Treatment Choice (TC). Approximately 408 participants will be randomly assigned 2:1 to either guadecitabine or TC.
Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
Guadecitabine: 60 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) given subcutaneously (SC) daily on Days 1-5 in 28-day cycles (delayed as needed to allow blood count recovery). Treatment should be given for at least 6 total cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression requiring alternative therapy. Beyond 6 cycles, treatment should continue as long as the participant continues to benefit. BSC should be given according to standard and institutional practice.
Treatment Choice (TC): Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
i. ≥50% increase in bone marrow blasts from pre-HMA-treatment levels or from nadir post-HMA-treatment levels to >5% (for participants with pretreatment or nadir blasts ≤5%) or to >10% (for participants with pretreatment or nadir blasts >5%), and/or ii. Transfusion dependent and ≥2 gram/deciliter (g/dL) reduction of Hgb from pre-HMA-treatment levels.
Other prior treatments for MDS such as lenalidomide, cytarabine, intensive chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin and other growth factors, or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are allowed.
Exclusion criteria
Other names: SGI-110
Time frame: From randomization up to death (up to approximately 38.6 months)
OS was defined as the number of days from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death due to any cause. Survival time was censored on the last date the participant is known alive with no event of death. OS time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Transfusion independence rate was calculated as the number of participants with neither RBC nor platelet transfusion for any period of 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment (or cycle 1 day 1 { C1D1} visit date for participants randomized to BSC or randomization date for participants not treated) and up to treatment discontinuation (or 180 days for participants discontinuing the treatment within 6 months), while maintaining haemoglobin (Hgb) ≥8 gram per deciliter (g/dL) and platelets ≥20×10^9/liter (L) divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy analysis. RBC or Platelet transfusion independence rate was defined similarly as above. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the single decimal point.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
mCR was defined as per 2006 Myelodysplastic Syndromes International Council for Harmonisation (MDS IWG) criteria as reduction of bone marrow (BM) blasts to ≤5% and decrease by 50% or more with or without normalization of peripheral counts. Transfusion independence rate was calculated as the number of participants with neither RBC nor platelet transfusion for any period of 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment (or C1D1 visit date for participants randomized to BSC or randomization date for participants not treated) and up to treatment discontinuation (or 180 days for participants discontinuing the treatment within 6 months), while maintaining Hgb ≥8 g/dL and platelets ≥20×10^9/L divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy analysis. The percentage of participants who achieved mCR and transfusion independence simultaneously in the same period were calculated for each group. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the single decimal point.
Time frame: From randomization up to 12 months
One year survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants that survived at the end of the first year from randomization. Participants who did not have death in record were censored on the last date known to be alive. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: From randomization up to 46.6 months
Leukemia-free survival was defined as the number of days from randomization to the earliest date when participants have bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) blasts ≥20%, conversion to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or death of any cause. Participants with no events in leukemia-free survival were censored on the last date of BM or PB blasts assessment, whichever is later. Survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The date of each hospital admission and discharge was collected for each participant for up to 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent prior to that time. Duration of each hospital stay in days was calculated as date of discharge minus date of admission. The NDAOH within first 6 month period was calculated as: NDAOH 6M=180 -total duration of all hospital stays within 180 days from the first treatment -number of death days before Day 180. For participants who were lost to follow-up within 6 months, the NDAOH was calculated conservatively assuming that the participant would have died the day after the last contact day.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
DR: Complete Response(CR), Partial Response(PR),Marrow Complete Response(mCR), and Hematological Improvement(HI) including HI with Erythroid (HI-E), HI with Neutrophil (HI-N), or HI with Platelet (HI-P) based on IWG 2006 criteria. CR: BM:≤5% myeloblasts, Peripheral blood: Hgb≥11g/dL, Platelets(PLTs)≥100x10^9/L, Neutrophils≥1.0x10^9/L, Blasts 0%. PR: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BM blasts decreased ≥50% over pretreatment but still>5%, Cellularity, morphology not relevant. HI responses:1) HI-E: Hgb increase ≥1.5g/dL, Relevant reduction of RBC units transfusions by absolute ≥4 RBC transfusions/8 week(wk) compared with pretreatment transfusion number previous 8wk. Only RBC transfusions given for Hgb≤9.0g/dL. 2) HI-P: Absolute increase≥30x10^9/L starting>20x10^9/L PLTs; Increase from<20x10^9/L to>20x10^9/L and by≥100%. 3) HI-N: ≥100% increase, absolute increase>0.5x10^9/L.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Duration of complete response (in number of days) was calculated from the first time a CR was observed to the date of the earliest of the following three events: 1) relapse/disease progression, 2) start of alternative therapy (except Hematopoietic Cell Transplant [HCT]) or 3) death. In the absence of any event, the duration of CR was censored at the last available time point (BM assessment, PB assessment, or safety/long-term follow-up visit) at which an event was not observed. Duration of complete response was analysed using a Kaplan-Meier method for participants who achieved a CR during the study. CR: BM: ≤5% myeloblasts (all cell lines normal maturation), Peripheral blood: Hgb ≥11g/dL, PLTs ≥100x10^9/L, Neutrophils ≥1.0x10^9/L, Blasts 0%.
Time frame: From study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response was first documented (up to approximately 46.6 months)
Time to first response was the time(days) from randomization to first date when any response was achieved. Time to CR was the time(days) from randomization to first date when CR was achieved. Time to best response was the time(days) from randomization to first date when participant's best response (CR,PR,mCR or HI) was achieved. CR:BM:≤5% myeloblasts, Peripheral blood:Hgb≥11g/dL,PLTs≥100x10^9/L,Neutrophils≥1.0x10^9/L,Blasts 0%. PR: All CR criteria except BM blasts decreased≥50% over pretreatment but still >5%,Cellularity,morphology not relevant. mCR: Reduction of BM blasts to≤5%; decrease ≥50% with/without normalization of peripheral counts. HI responses:1)HI-E:Hgb increase≥1.5 g/dL, Relevant reduction of RBC units transfusions by absolute≥4 RBC transfusions/8wk compared with pretreatment transfusion number previous 8wk. 2)HI-P:Absolute increase≥30x10^9/L starting>20x10^9/L PLTs; Increase from≤20 to>20x10^9/L and by≥100% 3)HI-N:≥100% granulocyte increase, absolute increase>0.5x10^9/L.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The total number of RBCs transfused or, separately, the total number of platelets transfused up to the 6-month time point for each participant was counted from the date of randomization to Day 180, the date of last contact, or date of death, whichever occurred earlier. One RBC or platelet transfusion was defined as one unit, and a single bag of RBCs or platelets was considered one unit. The mean total number of RBC or platelet units transfused per participant is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L, first component is a descriptive system five-item health state profile that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a second component visual analogue scale (VAS) that measures health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. The health status is converted to an index value using the country-specific weighted scoring algorithm for England. The summary index value for the England ranges from a worst score of -0.281 to a best score of 1. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. The second component, EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).
Time frame: From first dose through end of study (up to approximately 46.6 months)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is defined any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is congenital anomaly; is suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product or is medically important. Treatment emergent AEs which are those with onset date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug on C1D1 until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or the start of an alternative anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From first dose until 60 days after study treatment initiation
Number of deaths, regardless of cause, within 30 or 60 days from the first study dose divided by the total number of participants included in the Safety Analysis Set. Participants who died within 30 days were also included in the 60-day mortality calculations.
Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) Versus Treatment Choice in Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Previously Treated With Hypomethylating Agents
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00255346
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Agnogenic Myeloid Metaplasia
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03814005
Bone Marrow Diseases, Chronic Disease
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05218902
Bone Marrow Diseases, Chronic Disease
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02610777
Bone Marrow Diseases, Chronic Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details