Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT02039830

Group Versus Individual Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence in Aging Women

The recommended treatment for urinary incontinence (UI) in women is individualised pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training, a costly and resource-intense approach; one Canada is currently unable to meet. This non-inferiority randomized control trial seeks to determine if group-based PFM training is as effective as individualised PFM training for treating UI in women 65 and over, and to establish the cost-effectiveness of both. Demonstrating that group-based treatment is at least as good as individualised one-on-one treatment and more cost-effective would warrant including group-based PFM training as a first-line UI treatment.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) in women increases with age but, unbeknownst to many, it is not a normal part of aging and, in most cases, can be effectively treated. Yet today, the majority of senior women go untreated due to a lack of both human and financial resources. In Canada, there are currently 3 million senior women. Over the next 15 years their numbers are expected to grow significantly, as will the incidence of UI. The number of senior women requiring treatment, let alone the future demand, makes it imperative that more cost-effective treatments be identified. The prevalence of UI in community- dwelling women 65 and over is high - 55% experience stress or urge UI, or even both, and of these, 20 to 25% are classified as having severe symptoms. Not only is UI a serious medical condition but it is also undeniably a social problem, engendering embarrassment and negative self-perceptions. It is associated with reduced social interactions and physical activities, with poor self-rated health, impaired emotional and psychological well-being and impaired sexual relationships. Moreover, it doubles women's risk of being admitted to a nursing home, independent of age or the presence of any other co-morbid conditions. It severely undermines a woman's right to healthy aging. Without doubt, this pervasive and serious condition requires immediate attention. Demographics, the negative impact on older women's functional autonomy and the current unmet treatment needs alone renders improving continence care for older women a priority for the Institute of Aging. This study aims to evaluate if group- based physiotherapy treatment is at least as good as individualized one-on-one physiotherapy treatment for treating urinary incontinence in aging women. The treatment efficacy will be assessed in 364 women (aged 60 years and older) suffering from stress or mixed urinary incontinence and recruited in 4 hospitals and in the community.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 60 years or older
  • suffering from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) symptoms
  • at least 3 urinary incontinence episodes per week x 3 months or more
  • ambulatory without the need of assisted device
  • understand French or English instruction
  • hormonal replacement stable for 6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • present risk factors known to interfere with the effects of PFM training
  • >2 degree Pop-Q
  • body mass index >35
  • chronic constipation
  • have received physiotherapy or surgical treatment within the last year

Treatment and study plan

Group physiotherapy

Behavioral

Multimodal Group physiotherapy 12 weeks of weekly Group physiotherapy treatments including education and pelvic floor muscle exercises

Individual one-on-one physiotherapy

Behavioral

Multimodal Individual physiotherapy 12 weeks of weekly Individual physiotherapy treatments including education and pelvic floor muscle exercises

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the number of UI episodes

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation.

    evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire on urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI short form)

  2. Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation.

    evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire on nocturia (ICIQ-Nocturia)

  3. Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.

    evaluated using the 24h PAD test

  4. Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.

    evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Vaginal Symptoms Module (ICIQ-VS)

  5. Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.

    evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Modules (ICIQ-FLUTS)

  6. UI related QOL

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol)

  7. UI related self-efficacy

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment

    evaluated using the Geriatric self-efficacy index

  8. UI related self-efficacy

    Time frame: 13 weeks after recruitment (recollection of what was before recruitment and what is now) and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated using the Broom PFM Self-efficacy scale

  9. Costs related to interventions

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated using the modified Dowel-Bryant Incontinence Cost Index

  10. Anthropometric measurements

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment

    evaluated using height and weight measurements, which will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  11. PFM function

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment

    evaluated combining digital palpation (Oxford scale), vaginal atrophy index and dynamometry

  12. PFM morphology

    Time frame: at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment

    evaluated using transperineal US

  13. Patient reported improvement and satisfaction

    Time frame: 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment

    evaluated using Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) and Benefit and willingness

  14. Adherence to intervention and home exercises

    Time frame: after recruitment (once/week during 12 weeks), 13 weeks after after recruitment, 6 months after recruitment, at 9 months after recruitment, 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated using homemade questionnaire including attendance to intervention and assiduity to home exercises program

  15. Qualitative interview

    Time frame: 8 years after recruitement for those who completed the 12-month evaluation

    evaluated using homemade questionnaire including assiduity to lifestyle modification, changes in general health status, changes in medication, perceived change in UI symptoms, consultation with healthcare professionals for UI, and use of additional treatments for UI.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Group Physiotherapy Compared to Individual Physiotherapy to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Aging Women: A Randomized Control Trial

Acronym: GROUP

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 20, 2014
Registry last updated
Sep 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.