Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07629427

Green or Pink? A Comparison of Pain and Procedural Difficulty With Intravenous Cannulas in the Emergency Department

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures in both medical and nursing practice. It is essential for blood sampling, intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation, medication administration, blood product transfusion, and IV contrast-enhanced radiological imaging. In emergency department (ED) settings, where patients may deteriorate rapidly, timely and adequate IV access is of critical importance. Larger-bore cannulas allow faster fluid and contrast delivery and are less prone to occlusion; however, Larger-bore cannulas are often perceived to cause greater pain and procedural difficulty compared to smaller-bore cannulas. This perception may lead clinicians to prefer smaller cannulas, potentially compromising care quality in patients who may unexpectedly deteriorate.

Cannula insertion inherently causes discomfort, pain, and anxiety for patients, and multiple failed attempts further amplify these effects. Patient satisfaction, an important dimension of overall care quality, is directly influenced by pain experience and the number of insertion attempts. Patients requiring two or more attempts for successful cannulation are generally classified as having difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Repeated failed attempts are associated with vascular injury, increased patient distress, delays in diagnosis and treatment, and greater consumption of healthcare resources. The A-DIVA score, developed by Van Loon et al., enables risk stratification for IV access difficulty at triage, classifying patients as low, moderate, or high risk, and facilitating proactive measures such as ultrasound guidance or involvement of experienced personnel for high-risk patients.

This single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial aims to compare 18-gauge (18G) and 20-gauge (20G) PIVCs in terms of patient-reported pain intensity and nurse-reported procedural difficulty in adult ED patients with low-to-moderate A-DIVA risk. The investigators hypothesize that 18G cannulas cause similar pain and procedural difficulty compared to 20G cannulas in this patient population.

The study will be conducted at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital Emergency Department. Ethics approval has been granted by the Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Adult patients (18 years and older) requiring IV access for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes and classified as low or moderate A-DIVA risk will be eligible. Patients with cognitive impairment, altered mental status, or hemodynamic instability (systolic BP less than 90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg) will be excluded.

Eligible consenting patients will be randomized 1:1 using a block randomization method (block size of 4) to either 18G or 20G cannula insertion. Cannula assignment will be delivered to nurses in sealed envelopes. Patients will be blinded to cannula size using blackout goggles. Cannulation will be performed by ED nurses following standard antiseptic and securement procedures, targeting the dorsum of the hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa. If the first attempt fails, at least one additional attempt with the assigned cannula will be required before allowing free choice of cannula and site.

The primary outcomes are patient-reported pain intensity and nurse-reported procedural difficulty, each assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately after the first cannulation attempt and compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. Secondary outcomes include the comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. This comparison will also be performed separately according to cannulation site, operator experience, A-DIVA risk category, patient age, and patient sex.

A total of 204 patients (102 per group) will be enrolled, based on 90% power, 5% type I error, a minimum clinically important difference of 13 mm on the VAS, and a 10% dropout allowance.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Requiring intravenous access for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes
  • Classified as low or moderate risk according to the A-DIVA (Adult Difficult Intravenous Access) score
  • Provision of informed consent by the patient, a relative, or a legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to effectively communicate pain intensity due to cognitive impairment, altered mental status, or visual or language difficulties
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg

Treatment and study plan

18-gauge peripheral intravenous cannula

Device

Peripheral intravenous cannulation performed using an 18-gauge (18G, green) cannula inserted into the dorsum of the hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa by an emergency department nurse following standard antiseptic and securement procedures. No local anesthetic agents will be used. Patients will be blinded to cannula size using blackout goggles.

20-gauge peripheral intravenous cannula

Device

Peripheral intravenous cannulation performed using a 20-gauge (20G, pink) cannula inserted into the dorsum of the hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa by an emergency department nurse following standard antiseptic and securement procedures. No local anesthetic agents will be used. Patients will be blinded to cannula size using blackout goggles.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    Patient-reported pain intensity assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after the first cannulation attempt, compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The VAS score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The unit of measure is the score on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm).

  2. Procedural difficulty

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    Nurse-reported procedural difficulty assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after the first cannulation attempt, compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The VAS score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (worst imaginable difficulty). The unit of measure is the score on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm)

Secondary outcomes

  1. First-attempt cannulation success rate

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The proportion of participants with successful cannulation achieved on the first attempt, compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants (%).

  2. Comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate by cannulation site between groups

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The first-attempt cannulation success rate at each cannulation site (dorsum of hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa), assessed by procedural documentation, will be compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants with successful first-attempt cannulation per site (%).

  3. Comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate by operator experience between groups

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The first-attempt cannulation success rate across different levels of operator experience, assessed in years of clinical experience, will be compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants with successful first-attempt cannulation per operator experience level (%).

  4. Comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate by A-DIVA score between groups

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The first-attempt cannulation success rate across A-DIVA risk categories, assessed using the Adult Difficult Intravenous Access (A-DIVA) scoring tool, will be compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants with successful first-attempt cannulation per A-DIVA risk category (%). The A-DIVA score ranges from 0 to 5, with scores of 0-1 indicating low risk, 2-3 indicating moderate risk, and 4-5 indicating high risk of difficult intravenous access.

  5. Comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate by patient age between groups

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The first-attempt cannulation success rate across different age groups, recorded in years at the time of enrollment, will be compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants with successful first-attempt cannulation per age group (%).

  6. Comparison of first-attempt cannulation success rate by patient sex between groups

    Time frame: Immediately after the first cannulation attempt

    The first-attempt cannulation success rate by patient sex (male or female), recorded at the time of enrollment, will be compared between the 18G and 20G cannula groups. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants with successful first-attempt cannulation per sex (%).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparison of 18-Gauge and 20-Gauge Intravenous Cannulas in Terms of Pain and Procedural Difficulty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Emergency Department

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.