MaxSpiolto® Respimat® 160 Characters...
Drugas per the approved SmPC
Other names: INSPIOLTO, SPIOLTO, STIOLTO, VAHELVA, YANIMO
NCT Number: NCT03419962
Open-label observational study: including COPD patients receiving treatment with Spiolto® Respimat® for approximately 6 weeks, which is the average time between two medical consultations
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Metropolitan, Aegina, Greece
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
as per the approved SmPC
Other names: INSPIOLTO, SPIOLTO, STIOLTO, VAHELVA, YANIMO
Time frame: Between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit after end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
Therapeutic success was defined as ≥0.4 point decrease in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
The CCQ contained 10 questions about symptoms, functional status and mental status. Each of the 10 CCQ questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale (ranging between 0=asymptomatic/no-limitation, to 6=symptomatic/totally limited). The sum of the scores divided by 10 gives the CCQ score. A higher CCQ score is indicative of worse status. A decrease of 0.4 points is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for CCQ score.
Time frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
Absolute change in Clinical COPD Questionaire (QQC) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
The CCQ contained 10 questions about symptoms, functional status and mental status. Each of the 10 CCQ questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale between 0 and 6. The sum of the scores divided by 10 gives the CCQ score which measured the health and functional status. A higher CCQ score is indicative of worse status.
Time frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
Absolute change in the functional status subdomain of Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ-4) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
The CCQ-4 score is a subdomain of the CCQ-score. It contains 4 questions about the functional status of patients. Each questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale, (ranging between 0=asymptomatic/no-limitation, to 6=symptomatic/totally limited). The QQC-4 score was calculated by the sum of 4 questions divided by 4. A higher CCQ-4 score was indicative of worse status.
Time frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
General condition of the patient, evaluated by Physician´s Global Evaluation (PGE) score at visit 1 and visit 2.
The PGE score uses a eight-point ordinal scale, ranging from poor (1,2) to excellent (7,8).
Time frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).
The patients satisfaction with Respimat was assessed at end of study (visit 2) by the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) Part 1. PASAPQ Part 1 uses a 7-point ordinal scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied, to rate the satisfaction with inhaler attributes. The patients were requested to describe their satisfaction level answering three questions.
Time frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit)
Patients preference for Respimat® Inhaler vs. Spiriva HandiHaler (HH) was assessed using the abbreviated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) Part 2 survey. Patients were requested to describe their preference for each inhaler device by answering 2 additional questions.
Time frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).
Patients' reported willingness to continue using either of the inhalers was measured with a scale score ranking from 0 to 100. 0 indicates not willing to continue using this inhaler and 100 indicates definitely willing to continue using it.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Changes in Health and Functional Status in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) During Therapy With Spiolto® Respimat® [ELLACTO]
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07252908
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chongqing, Chognqing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07649577
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT06979518
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Cypress, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06367686
Apnea, Chronic Disease
Tønsberg, Norway
View Trial Details