Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02634580

Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects-4

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab compared with ezetimibe, on percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemic adults unable to tolerate an effective dose of a statin.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Research Site, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

After screening participants who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomized with an allocation ratio of 2:2:1:1 into 4 groups: evolocumab (AMG 145) 420 mg administered by subcutaneous injection monthly and placebo pill daily; evolocumab 140 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every two weeks and placebo pill by mouth daily; placebo 420 mg administered by subcutaneous injection monthly and ezetimibe 10 mg pill daily; placebo 140 mg administered subcutaneous injection every two weeks and ezetimibe 10 mg pill daily. Randomization was stratified by screening LDL-C level and baseline statin use. Participants on low or atypical statin dose therapy must have been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and throughout the blinded portion of the study; the dose could not be adjusted during screening and for the duration of the study. After Week 12, ezetimibe was discontinued and participants moved to an open-label dose of evolocumab administered by subcutaneous injection either every two weeks or monthly and their standard of care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥ 20 to ≤ 80 years of age
  • Japanese by self-identification
  • Not on a statin or on a low dose statin with stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
  • Subject not at LDL-C goal
  • History of statin intolerance to at least 2 statins
  • Lipid lowering therapy has been stable prior to screening for at least 4 weeks
  • Fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure
  • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism

Treatment and study plan

Evolocumab

Biological

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Other names: AMG 145, Repatha

ezetimibe

Drug

Tablet for oral administration

Other names: Zetia

Placebo to Evolocumab

Drug

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Placebo Ezetimibe

Drug

Tablet for oral administration

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

    For all efficacy endpoints the two dosing regimens (every 2 weeks and every month) for each treatment were pooled for analysis.

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  2. Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL

    Time frame: Weeks 10 and 12

    Mean low density lipoprotein-cholesterol response was defined as LDL-C < 70 mg/dL [1.8 mol/L].

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a LDL-C of Less Than 70 mg/dL at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  15. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  18. Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  20. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

  21. Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 10 and 12

  22. Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Japanese Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Due to Muscle Related Side Effects

Acronym: GAUSS-4

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 18, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 10, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.