Vortioxetine
DrugVortioxetine tablet
Other names: LuAA21004
NCT Number: NCT02972632
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of treatment with vortioxetine on participant goal achievement after a change in antidepressant medication for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
ATP Clinical Research, Inc., Costa Mesa, California, United States
The drug being tested in this study is called Vortioxetine. Vortioxetine is being tested to treat depression in people who have major depressive disorder. This study will look at effectiveness of treatment with vortioxetine in participant's goal achievement for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
The study enrolled 123 patients. Participants will receive:
All participants will be asked to take one tablet at the same time each day throughout the study. The participants will receive a starting dose of 10 mg. The dose may be up-titrated to 20 mg. The dose may then be decreased by 5 mg based on participant's response and tolerability to higher dose as judged by the Investigator.
This multi-center trial will be conducted in Unites States. The overall time to participate in this study is 19 weeks. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic and will be contacted by telephone for 4 weeks after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Vortioxetine tablet
Other names: LuAA21004
Time frame: Week 12
GAS is a tool to measure progress each participant has towards achieving their individualized goals. The standardized scoring was applied for statistical analysis. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant to conduct goal-setting at the outset of study. Another evaluation took place at end of study (EOS) visit to determine the level of progress at that time. The score for each goal ranged from -2 (much worse) to +2 (much better). GAS yielded a norm-based score standardized to a mean of 50 with a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher score indicates composite of 3 goals (50 or above) as response.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 6 and 12
GAS is a tool to measure progress each participant has towards achieving their individualized goals. The standardized scoring was applied for statistical analysis. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant to conduct goal-setting at outset of study. Another evaluation took place at EOS visit to determine level of progress at that time. The score for each goal ranged from -2 (much worse) to +2 (much better). GAS yielded a norm-based score standardized to a mean of 50 with SD of 10. The total score ranges between 22.6 and 77.4. A positive change from baseline in the composite of 3 goals (50 or above) indicates response.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 6 and 12
PHQ-9 is a well-established participant reported outcome tool for assessment of change in depressive symptoms and is a sensitive measure of depression severity. The PHQ-9 consists of a 9-item scale originally developed for primary care settings, with 1 item corresponding to each of the 9 made symptom criteria for depression in diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), asking if they have bothered the participant over the last 2 weeks. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). If any problems are answered 1 or higher, a final question on how difficult those problems made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people is completed, rated from not difficult at all to extremely difficult. The 9 questions are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 27 with higher scores reflecting greater severity. A positive change from baseline indicates severe condition.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 6 and 12
The PDQ-D is a 20-item, patient-reported questionnaire with a 7-day recall period. Scores for four subscales. All 20 items use the same 5-point ordinal categorical response scale to reflect the frequency of experiencing a specific cognitive problem in the past 7 days. Scores for each of the four measured subscales are calculated by assigning a value of 0 ("never in the past 7 days"), 1 ("rarely - once or twice"), 2 ("sometimes - 3-5 times"), 3 ("often - about once a day"), or 4 ("very often - more than once a day") to each item, then summing the five items of that subscale, to produce a score ranging from 0 to 20. A total global score for overall cognitive dysfunction (range 0-80) is calculated by summing the four subscale scores. Higher scores for each subscale and for the total score indicate greater perceived cognitive dysfunction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Q-LES-Q is a scale designed to allow researchers to assess the degree of a participant's quality of life in various areas of daily living. There is not a "Total Score" per se for the Q-LES-Q. The scale is divided into domains. Ninety-one of the 93 items are assembled into 8 categories: physical health/activities, feelings, work, household duties, school/course work, leisure time activities, social relations, and general activities. Items are scored on a 5 point scale, from 1 (not at all or never) to 5 (frequently or all the time), to indicate the degree of enjoyment or satisfaction experienced by domain. Raw summary scores are expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score within a given domain to facilitate comparisons across areas of functioning. The total score is based on the Overall Life Satisfaction question in General Activities and ranges from 1 to 5. A positive change from baseline indicates greater enjoyment/satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
WHO-5 is a short, self-administered questionnaire covering 5 positively worded items, related to positive mood (good spirits, relaxation), vitality (being active and waking up fresh and rested), and general interests (being interested in things). Each of the five items is rated from 0 (= not present) to 5 (= constantly present). Scores are summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25, with higher score meaning better well-being. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
CGI-S is a clinician rated scale designed to assess global severity of illness and change in the clinical condition over time. The CGI-S provides the clinician's impression of the participant's state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this participant population to rate the severity of the participant's mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal-not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher scores indicate greater severity of illness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assessed participant's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher scores indicated greater severity of illness.
Takeda
Industry
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Phase 4, Interventional, Flexible Dose Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Vortioxetine on Goal Achievement After a Change in Antidepressant Medication for the Treatment of Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04276259
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06001346
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Ames, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06266390
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06267846
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details