Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China
NCT Number: NCT06383494
Patients were randomly assigned to three supraglottic airway devices (SADs) groups for airway management after anesthesia induced. Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB) guided glottic exposure grading was performed and other airway management quality was recorded.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China
Mechanical ventilation was volume controlled and time cycled with tidal volumes (6-8 ml/kg) set to maintain peak inspiratory pressures of less than 20 cm H2O and ventilatory frequency adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) at 35-45 mmHg. Then a fiberoptic bronchoscope was passed through airway tube into the device to perform glottic exposure grading. Peak airway pressure, incidence of pharyngalgia, bleeding, hoarseness, and dysphagia were recorded.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient in this group received LMA supreme (one of laryngeal airway management device) for airway management during general anesthesia
Patient in this group received I-gel laryngeal (one of laryngeal airway management device) for airway management during general anesthesia
Patient in this group received GMA-Tulip (one of laryngeal airway management device) for airway management during general anesthesia
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to the end of surgery.
Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB) guided glottic exposure grading was performed.
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to 15 minutes after insertion.
Record peak airway pressure during surgery.
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to 15 minutes after insertion.
Record plateau airway pressure during surgery.
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to 30 minutes after insertion
Measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure after insertion of supraglottic airway device
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to 30 minutes after insertion
Measure the oropharyngeal leak pressure at 30 and 45 degrees of head rotation after insertion of supraglottic airway device
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to 15 minutes after insertion
Record the ventilation quality after the insertion of supraglottic airway device. In specific, The Ventilation Quality Score consists of three components: presence of normal CO₂ waveform, bilateral symmetrical chest rise, and absence of air leak at 20 mmHg airway pressure. Total scores range 0-3, with 0 indicating poor ventilation quality and 3 representing optimal ventilation.
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to the end of surgery
Record the abnormally ventilation events (air leakage, abnormal carbon dioxide wave, higher airway pressure, hypoxemia, supraglottic airway device adjustment, change into intubation) during surgery
Time frame: From the insertion of supraglottic airway device to the patient's transfer to the ward. An average of 3 hours.
Record side effects (blooding on the supraglottic airway device, pharyngalgia, hoarseness) at the end of surgery.
Time frame: Postoperative day 1.
Record side effects (pharyngalgia, hoarseness, cough when drinking), and adverse events (pneumonia, hypoxemia) 24 hours after surgery.
Time frame: From the initial insertion to the successful placement of nasogastric tube. An average of 20 minutes.
Record the nasogastric tube insertion success rate
Time frame: From the initial supraglottic airway device insertion to the successful placement of nasogastric tube. An average of 20 minutes.
Record the number of attempts for nasogastric tube insertion
Time frame: From the initial supraglottic airway device insertion to the successful placement of nasogastric tube. An average of 20 minutes.
Record the duration (seconds from insertion initiation to successful placement) of nasogastric tube insertion
Time frame: From the initial supraglottic airway device insertion to the successful placement of nasogastric tube. An average of 20 minutes.
Record the insertion difficulty (1-3 scale; 1=easy, 3=difficult) of nasogastric tube placement
Time frame: From the insertion of s SAD to the end of surgery. An average of 3 hours.
Record gas/fluid volume during the surgery
Time frame: From the mouth open to the device seated upon encountering resistance, averaging approximately 10 seconds.
Record the insertion duration (seconds from insertion initiation to successful placement) of SADs
Time frame: From the mouth open to the device seated upon encountering resistance, averaging approximately 10 seconds.
Record the insertion difficulty (1-3 scale; 1=easy, 3=difficult) of SADs
Time frame: From the mouth open to the device seated upon encountering resistance or able to ventilation after device's adjustment/reinsertion, averaging approximately 10 seconds.
Record the number of SAD insertion attempts.
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Other
GMA-Tulip, I-gel and the LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) Devices in Airway Management Under General Anesthesia, a Randomized Controlled Study (GLAM-I)
Acronym: GLAM-I
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07259629
Anesthesia, Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT03972423
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Complication
Versailles, IDF, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05111340
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Anesthesia
Arras, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07647588
Anesthesia, Behavior
Elâzığ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details