Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03765164

Glucose Control Using 1,5-AG Testing

Glycemic excursions (temporary increases in blood glucose) are associated with health complications. Standard tests for diabetes (e.g. random blood sugar and HbA1c) do not test for these excursions despite their association with several health complications. GlycoMark's 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a validated indicator of glucose excursions in addition to short-term (1-2 weeks) hyperglycemia.

This study is a pre-post, two-round randomized controlled study of a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians. Investigators will assess whether physician participants are able to identify and address glycemic variability and hyperglycemia in their patients and, when given access to GlycoMark assay results, improve their patient management decisions by taking steps to optimize glycemic control, and reduce unnecessary resource utilization.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

QURE Healthcare

San Francisco, California, 94109, United States

About this study

Nearly half of the adult population, 114 million Americans, are diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes, making it one of the most important public and personal health problems. Diabetes is the 7th leading cause of death in America and a contributing factor in many more deaths and lost days of productivity. Its complications include vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke and dementia. The cost of diabetes care and its complications lead to $176 billion in direct medical costs and $69 billion in reduced productivity. With an over 2-fold increase in diabetes prevalence in the past two decades and an estimated 1.5 million new cases expected annually, it is clinically and economically critical for this condition to be managed appropriately.

Diabetes treatment programs focus on controlling hyperglycemia (random glucose > 200 mg/dL) without causing hypoglycemia (glucose < 70 mg/dL). Glucose control is determined in a number of ways in current clinical practice. Immediate and fasting blood sugars are determined in routine chemistry tests. The standard measure of long-term diabetes control, HbA1c testing, provides a reliable reading of average blood glucose levels over a 2-3-month period. In patients with high HbA1c levels, HbA1c measurement guides management decisions and helps the clinician bring the long-term glucose levels under control in poorly controlled diabetic patients. Random blood sugars and HbA1c is limited in that they do not reflect glycemic control in intervals greater than the past few hours and 2-3 months. In particular, they do not provide an indication of frequent, temporary increases in blood glucose, termed glycemic excursions, which have been independently associated with several health complications. Since it takes months for HbA1c levels to stabilize, HbA1c levels are also not helpful for patients starting medication or changing drug therapy.

1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a molecule found in the blood and is a validated indicator of glucose excursions and short-term (1-2 weeks) hyperglycemia. In healthy patients without diabetes, or those with well-controlled diabetes, 1,5-AG is maintained at a steady state in the blood. However, during glycemic excursions, the molecule is actively purged from the body through the urine. Cleared by the FDA in 2003, the GlycoMark assay measures 1,5-AG levels in the blood. Low levels of 1,5-AG indicate the presence of potentially harmful glycemic excursion over the last 1 to 2 weeks, which may have been missed during random blood glucose testing and not sensitively detected by HbA1c.

GlycoMark testing provides clinical details on peak glucose levels, daily spikes, and response to drugs, including short term effects, of hypoglycemic agents that are otherwise not available, giving physicians a more complete understanding of their patient's glycemic control. This information may be clinically useful to help physicians make better management decisions, improve diabetes outcomes, avoid complications and reduce unnecessary spending.

This study is a pre-post, two-round randomized controlled study of a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians randomly assigned to a control or intervention arm. Enrolled participants will be asked to care for a sample of CPV® simulated patients. The simulated patients are adults aged 18-75 who present with diabetes, different levels of glycemic control and various co-morbidities. Participants randomized into an intervention-arm will receive educational materials and 1,5-AG test results when caring for their patients in round 2. Investigators will assess the participants' ability to identify and address glycemic variability and hyperglycemia and evaluate whether physicians who have access to GlycoMark take steps to optimize glycemic control and reduce unnecessary resource utilization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A minimum of 2 years post residency but no more than 30 years in practice
  • Board-certified in internal medicine or family practice, primary care physicians
  • In a private solo or multi-group practice
  • Minimum threshold of patients (40+) currently seen weekly
  • A minimum of 15% of their panel under their care for diabetes
  • Have not used GlycoMark assay in the past
  • Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Not board certified in their respective area of care
  • Academic-based practice
  • Have practiced as a board-certified physician for less than 2 or greater than 30 years
  • Have used the GlycoMark assay
  • Follow <40 patients weekly
  • < 15% of their patient panel under their care for diabetes
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to access the internet

Treatment and study plan

GlycoMark 1-5-AG

Diagnostic Test

Online educational materials on GlycoMark 1,5-AG and sample test results for simulated patients

Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes

Other

Simulated diabetic patients cared for online

Other names: CPVs

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnosis-Treatment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's identification and treatment of hyperglycemia, as measured by the participants diagnostic and treatment CPV case domain scores. In each domain of a CPV (history, physical exam, workup, diagnosis and treatment), participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each domain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Care

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's overall quality of care scores. In each CPV case, participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each case.

  2. Workup Costs

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between between the control and the intervention group in the average cost of diagnostic tests ordered.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Qure Healthcare, LLC

Industry

Collaborators

  • GlycoMark, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Glucose Control Using 1,5-AG: Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: GLUCAR

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 28, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.