Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04624256

Germline DNA-Based Radiosensitivity Biomarker Influence on Toxicity Following Prostate Radiotherapy, GARUDA Trial

This trial studies the changes in long-term physician-scored genitourinary toxicity achieved in prostate cancer patients eligible for stereotactic radiation therapy when both patients and physicians have access to convincing but non-validated germline signature that can characterize patients as having a low or high risk of developing toxicity after radiation therapy. The information learned from this study may guide patients' and physicians' decisions on radiotherapy fractionation.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the impact on the 2-year cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 scale, caused by presenting both the physicians and patients with the results of a non-prospectively validated biomarker panel that dichotomizes any given patient into having a high versus a low risk of late grade ≥2 GU physician-scored toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 scale, in patients who test positive for the biomarker.

II. To determine the late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity, as assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 scale, in patients who test negative for the biomarker.

III. To observe the proportions of patients who choose to receive conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy, and SBRT, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade ≥2 GU toxicity.

To determine the 2- and 5-year cumulative incidences of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) physician-reported toxicity, as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, following the same intervention as for the primary objective.

IV. To determine the incidence of acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, following the same intervention as for the primary objective.

V. To quantify the temporal changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes, as assessed by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 (EPIC-26), International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) QOL indices, following the same intervention as for the primary objective.

VI. To determine the 5-year cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 GU physician-reported toxicity, as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale.

OUTLINE:

Patients planning to undergo SBRT per standard of care undergo collection of cheek swab and blood samples for the analysis of germline biomarkers. Afterwards, patients and their physicians engage in discussion about which form of radiotherapy to proceed with. Based on the decision, patients predicted to be at low risk of toxicity with SBRT continue to receive SBRT over 14 days while patients predicted to be at high risk of toxicity with SBRT will be counseled to undergo either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy over 63-70 days, moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy over 28-35 days, or may opt to still receive SBRT over 14 days per standard of care.

After completion of radiotherapy treatment, patients are followed up at 1 ,3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months, and then every 6 months for 4 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed, clinical localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • No evidence of disease beyond the prostate and/or seminal vesicles (i.e., no suspicious pelvic lymph nodes or presence of metastatic disease outside the pelvis)
  • Staging workup as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) on the basis of risk grouping:
  • Low risk: No staging workup required
  • Favorable intermediate-risk: computed tomography (CT) abdomen/pelvis only if Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram predicts > 10% probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT simulation scan will count as a CT abdomen/pelvis)
  • Unfavorable intermediate-risk: technetium bone scan, CT abdomen/pelvis if MSKCC nomogram predicts > 10% probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT simulation scan will count as a CT abdomen/pelvis)
  • High-risk: technetium bone scan, CT abdomen/pelvis if MSKCC nomogram predicts > 10% probability of lymph node involvement (note: CT simulation scan will count as a CT abdomen/pelvis) =
  • Advanced imaging studies (i.e. prostate specific membrane antigen [PSMA] positron emission tomography [PET] and Axumin scan) can supplant a bone scan if performed first
  • Ability to understand, and willingness to sign, the written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with neuroendocrine or small cell carcinoma of the prostate
  • Patients with any evidence of distant metastases. Note, evidence of lymphadenopathy below the level of the renal arteries can be deemed loco regional per the discretion of the investigator
  • Prior whole-gland cryosurgery, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or brachytherapy of the prostate
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or ataxia telangiectasia

Treatment and study plan

Discussion

Procedure

Patients and physicians engage in discussion

Other names: Discuss

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo conventional hypofractionated radiation therapy

Other names: Hypofractionated Radiotherapy, hypofractionation

laboratory biomarker analysis

Other

Correlative studies

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Other

Ancillary studies

Other names: Quality of Life Assessment

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo SBRT

Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year cumulative incidence of late grade >= 2 physician-scored genitourinary toxicity

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 scale, stratified by positive or negative status for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade >= 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity in patients who test positive for the biomarker

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

    Assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade >= 2 GU toxicity.

  2. Late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) physician-scored toxicity in patients who test negative for the biomarker

    Time frame: Up to the first 90 days after radiotherapy

    Assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade >= 2 GU toxicity.

  3. Proportions of patients who choose to receive conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy, and SBRT, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade ≥2 GU toxicity.

    Time frame: Up to the first 90 days after radiotherapy (acute).

    Assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade >= 2 GU toxicity.

  4. 2- and 5-year cumulative incidences of late grade ≥2 GI physician-reported toxicity, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade ≥2 GU toxicity.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

    Assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, in patients who test positive or negative for the biomarker.

  5. Acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade ≥2 GU toxicity.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days

    Assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale, based on being positive or negative for the biomarker thought to predict for late grade >= 2 GU toxicity. The timeframe will be restricted to the first 90 days after radiotherapy.

  6. Change in patient-reported urinary quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years

    • The temporal changes in patient-reported QOL outcomes will be obtained depending on the instrument used. For the EPIC-26 instrument, these will be represented by changes from baseline in the urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, bowel, sexual function, and hormone/vitality domains. Changes will be analyzed with respect to whether they represent minimally important differences. For the IPSS and SHIM instruments, the numerical change from baseline, as well as the raw score at any given timepoint, will be extracted. The scores will range from 0-100, with a higher number indicating a better quality of life. Changes will be analyzed with respect to whether they represent minimally important differences, based on approved thresholds in the literature.
  7. 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival

    Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years

    Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with biochemical recurrence (BCR) defined as serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels that are 2 ng/mL higher than the nadir PSA achieved after magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

  8. Change in patient-reported sexual quality of life outcome

    Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years

    will be assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Scores (I-PSS) instrument by five years. Scoring is from 1 - 35, a higher number is worse outcome.

  9. Change in patient-reported sexual quality of life by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men instrument by five years

    Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years

    Will be represented by changes from baseline in the urinary incontinence and urinary obstruction domains on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men instrument (SHIM). coring from 1-25, higher number is better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • MiraDX

Registry information

Official study title

Germline DNA-Based Radiosensitivity Biomarker Influence on Toxicity Following Prostate Radiotherapy

Acronym: GARUDA

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Nov 10, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.