Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03890679

Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (The GEMINI Study)

The Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (The GEMINI Study) is a research study aimed at comparing the clinical and economic utility of performing rapid whole genomic sequencing versus a targeted genomic sequencing panel on neonates and infants suspected of having a genetic disorder. This study is funded by the National Institutes of Health.

This multicenter, prospective clinical trial will enroll 400 subjects at the Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center (Boston, MA), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH), Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital (New York, NY), North Carolina Children's Hospital (Chapel Hill, NC), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), and Rady Children's Hospital (San Diego, CA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 day–1 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego, San Diego, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multicenter, prospective clinical trial will examine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of NewbornDx, a targeted genomic sequencing panel for use in the neonate, and rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS) testing in high-risk infants with signs/symptoms consistent with a possible genetic disorder. Infants will undergo NewbornDx and rWGS (proband) testing. The biological parent(s), when available, will undergo NewbornDx testing at the same time as the infant. For rWGS,the infant will undergo testing first. If a specific diagnosis that is consistent with the phenotype is not made with rWGS proband analysis alone, the parent(s) will undergo rWGS. The study will also evaluate the cost effectiveness of each test as well as standard of care (SOC) testing. A retrospective chart review of infants with suspected genetic disorders will be done to understand 1-year cost and health outcomes that would have been incurred in the absence of the advanced testing. The resulting data from the trial will be used in the economic evaluation comparing NewbornDx, rWGS, and SOC over a 1-year period and used as basis to simulate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of these testing strategies. A web-based clinical reference database to provide references, clinical management guidelines, opportunities for clinical trial participation, and support groups for each condition will be developed with separate interfaces for the parent/guardian(s) and medical provider. The clinical reference database will be qualitatively assessed by a survey of medical providers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Documented informed consent from the parent/guardian
  • Signs/symptoms consistent with a possible genetic disorder
  • Admitted to a hospital participating in this study at the time of enrollment
  • Less than one year corrected gestational age

Exclusion criteria

  • A known genetic diagnosis (e.g. prenatal testing)
  • Major congenital anomaly associated with a chromosomal anomaly detected on prenatal testing
  • Presence of documented congenital infection
  • Infants considered non-viable due to prematurity (< 23 0/7 weeks GA)

Treatment and study plan

rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS)

Diagnostic Test

rWGS and NewbornDx are genomic sequencing platforms

Other names: NewbornDx

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by NewbornDx

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    If NewbornDx diagnoses a genetic disorder

  2. The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by rWGS

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    If rWGS diagnoses a genetic disorder

  3. Time in Hours to a Positive Result by NewbornDx

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by NewbornDx

  4. Time in Hours to a Positive Result by rWGS

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by rWGS

  5. Perception of the Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing

    Time frame: 1 week

    The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey using units on a likert scale with 1 meaning not useful at all and 5 meaning very useful. The Clinician Assessment of clinical utility was done collectively as a whole for both modes of genomic sequencing.

  6. Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing as Assessed by Changes in Clinical Care Management or Goals of Care

    Time frame: 1 week

    The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey selecting the specific types of 35 possible management changes (i.e. surgical intervention implemented, medication changed, etc.) The intent was to examine any changes in care resulting from completing either genomic sequencing testing.

Secondary outcomes

  1. One Year Cost-effectiveness of Entire Cohort.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 1 year corrected gestational age

    Total cost of hospitalization, post-discharge follow-up until infant's 1 year CGA (corrected gestational age). Cost effectiveness of the cohort was measured across both sequence groups as a single group.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tufts Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
  • MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
  • Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego
  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • University of Pittsburgh

Registry information

Acronym: GEMINI

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 26, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.