Rutgers University
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
NCT Number: NCT03326713
GRACE is a randomized 3-arm trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of two remote cancer communication interventions: 1) a targeted generic print (TP) or 2) a tailored telephone-based counseling and navigation intervention (TCN). Post-award, the target sample size was revised to (n=642) with NIH permission.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
There is increasing evidence that activated and engaged patients who are equipped with necessary skills and information are more likely to follow through with recommended care and have better health outcomes at reduced costs. Identification of individuals at increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is crucial for cancer survivors and their families to benefit from biomedical advances in cancer prevention, early detection, treatment and survivorship. The primary purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of two remote interventions aimed at promoting cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) for HBOC. The randomized controlled trial will have 3 arms: usual care (UC) vs. targeted generic print (TP) vs. tailored telephone counseling and navigation intervention (TCN).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Breast Cancer
Ovarian Cancer
Exclusion criteria
Have had prior genetic counseling or testing for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer
A health coach will conduct a 30-45 minute telephone counseling session with participants. Prior to the telephone session, participants will receive the same brochure that the TP arm receives. After the phone call, participants will receive a tailored follow-up letter which will include images tailored to the individual's age, self-identified ethnicity, and family composition.
Participants will be mailed an educational brochure within two weeks of completing the baseline survey that addresses important evidence-based theoretical targets: CGRA guideline (knowledge), threat appraisal (to validate or raise risk perceptions, HBOC seriousness), response efficacy (benefits and expectations about CGRA), self-efficacy messages (CGRA resources, insurance reimbursement, and assistance for those with financial challenges) and possible actions to take (make an appointment and discuss with provider). Both the targeted print and tailored intervention materials were developed using formative community engaged research methods.
A usual care arm is included to assess CGRA uptake in the absence of intervention as well as priming from the surveys for the primary outcome analysis.
Time frame: 6 months following the interventions for TP and TCN, and 6 months following the baseline survey for the UC arm.
Participants reported whether they had sought cancer CGRA (i.e. genetic counseling and/or testing) in surveys at the 6-month follow-up. Participants who reported receiving a CGRA were asked to provide written consent allowing research staff to obtain document of receipt of the genetic services.
Time frame: 12 months following the interventions for TP and TCN, and 12 months following the baseline survey for the UC arm.
Participants reported whether they had sought cancer CGRA (i.e. genetic counseling and/or testing) in surveys at the 12-month follow-up. Participants who reported receiving a CGRA were asked to provide written consent, allowing research staff to obtain documents of receipt of the genetic services.
Time frame: 1 month following the interventions for TP and TCN, and 1 months following the baseline survey for the UC arm.
Questionnaire: Decisional conflict associated with the CGRA decision will be measured separately with 4 items using the SURE Scale (Sure of myself; Understand information; Risk-benefit ratio; Encouragement). Range from 0-4, with 0 indicating high decisional conflict.
Time frame: 1 month following the interventions for TP and TCN, and 1 months following the baseline survey for the UC arm.
Questionnaire: One item will measure future intention to get a cancer genetic risk assessment within the next 6 weeks. Responses for this item ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely likely).
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Other
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Guideline-based Genetic Counseling in Ethnically and Geographically Diverse Cancer Survivors
Acronym: GRACE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04553926
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Ansan, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02009449
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05185947
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04817501
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, Russia
View Trial Details