University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Location contact
Ivy Ow
CONTACT
Michelle Melisko, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07512271
This study evaluates the safety, accuracy, and impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed to support patient education in breast cancer care for breast oncology patients under selected physicians care within the University of California, San Francisco breast cancer center and affiliate sites.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Ivy Ow
CONTACT
Michelle Melisko, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CONTACT
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Lead-in period: To evaluate the safety of the OpenEvidence CareConnect a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Large Language Model (LLM) tool during the initial lead-in phase in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
II. To evaluate the clinical accuracy and appropriateness of the OpenEvidence CareConnect RAG LLM tool in delivering general health and breast cancer-specific information.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess patient perceptions of the AI tool's helpfulness, alignment with other information sources, and its impact on communication with their oncology care team.
II. To evaluate provider perceptions of the tool's usefulness and impact on communication and the quality of patient education.
III. To compare patient experiences and perceptions between immediate access and delayed access to the AI educational tool.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the changes in inter-visit communication between patient and care team with and without access to the AI tool.
II. To understand patient concerns and educational needs related to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
OUTLINE: The first 5 participants will be assigned to the Lead-In Phase. After which, the next 30 participants will be randomized to either an Intervention arm or a Waitlist Control arm. Participants on the Waitlist Control arm will cross over after 3 months to the Intervention arm. Surveys and provider assessments occur throughout, and adherence and safety are monitored during the lead-in. Each participant will be on study for approximately 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will complete surveys to evaluate their experience using OpenEvidence CareConnect RAG LLM tool.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Large Language Model (LLM) tool
The provider will complete a survey to assess OpenEvidence CareConnect RAG LLM tool's usefulness and the quality of its patient education communication.
Time frame: Up to 90 months
Safety and Risk Assessment evaluates safety concerns based on provider responses using a 5-point Likert scale.
Time frame: Up to 180 days
AI patient Education Tool Survey evaluates clinical accuracy and appropriateness of the OpenEvidence CareConnect tool based on provider responses using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Time frame: Uup to 180 days
Provider will evaluate participant questions, answer accuracy and content provided within the OpenEvidence using 3-point scales.
Time frame: Up to 180 days
The AI Tool Experience Survey is a 40-question instrument to assess participants' perceptions of usability, usefulness, clinical integration, and support for shared decision-making. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Time frame: up to 180 days
Medical Information Experience Survey is a 13-question instrument to evaluate how participants access and engage with medical information. Questions are measured using a 5-point Likert scale.
Time frame: up to 180 days
The AI Tool Experience Survey is a 40-question instrument to assess participants' perceptions of usability, usefulness, clinical integration, and support for shared decision-making. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Comparisons of survey responses between the immediate and delayed access groups will be reported.
Time frame: Up to 180 days
Medical Information Experience Survey is a 13-question instrument evaluates how participants access and engage with medical information. Questions are measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Comparisons of survey responses between the immediate and delayed access groups will be reported.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Accuracy and Effect of Prescribed Generative AI Patient Education Module Within Breast Oncology Care
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07619365
Advanced Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07487844
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07578415
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT06797622
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details