Berzosertib
DrugGiven IV
Other names: 2-Pyrazinamine, 3-(3-(4-((Methylamino)methyl)phenyl)-5-isoxazolyl)-5-(4-((1-methylethyl)sulfonyl)phenyl)-, M 6620, M6620, VX 970, VX-970, VX970
NCT Number: NCT02595892
This randomized phase II trial studies how well ATR kinase inhibitor M6620 (M6620) and gemcitabine hydrochloride work compared to standard treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride alone in treating patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent). ATR kinase inhibitor M6620 may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking an enzyme needed for cell growth, and may also help gemcitabine hydrochloride work better. Gemcitabine hydrochloride is a drug used in chemotherapy that works to stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking cells from growing and repairing themselves, causing them to die. It is not yet known whether adding ATR kinase inhibitor M6620 to standard treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride is more effective than gemcitabine hydrochloride alone in treating patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Assess and compare progression free survival (PFS) between gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride)/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine and compare overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
II. Determine and compare the safety profile of gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone regimens.
III. Assess and compare PFS at 6 months between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
IV. Determine and compare the clinical benefit rate (CBR) between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
V. Determine and compare the duration of response (DOR) between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
VI. Determine and compare cancer antigen (CA)125 reduction by >= 50% between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
VII. Determine and compare overall survival (OS) between gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) and gemcitabine alone arms.
VIII. Determine the ORR for subjects in the gemcitabine alone arm who cross over to the gemcitabine/M6620 (VX-970) arm.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients experiencing disease progression may crossover to Arm II.
ARM II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride as in Arm I and ATR kinase inhibitor M6620 IV over 60-90 minutes on days 2 and 9. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 2 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: 2-Pyrazinamine, 3-(3-(4-((Methylamino)methyl)phenyl)-5-isoxazolyl)-5-(4-((1-methylethyl)sulfonyl)phenyl)-, M 6620, M6620, VX 970, VX-970, VX970
Given IV
Other names: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine
Given IV
Other names: dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine Hydrochloride, Gemcitabine HCI, Gemzar, LY 188011, LY-188011, LY188011
Time frame: Number of days from the day the subject received the first dose of protocol therapy to the date of documented progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death (regardless of cause), assessed up to 3 years
PFS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared between the two arms using the logrank test. Additionally, PFS was analyzed using a Cox Proportional Hazards Model, including the stratification factor, and will be used to estimate the hazard ratio of the gemcitabine hydrochloride (gemcitabine)/ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase inhibitor M6620 (formerly VX-970) arm relative to the gemcitabine alone arm and the associated 90% confidence interval. Disease progression, per protocol, is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Defined as the percentage of subjects achieving a response rating of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in the whole population. Per RECIST v1.1 definitions for target lesions and assessed by conventional CT and MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. ORR was summarized by counts (percentages) in each Arm.
Time frame: Number of days from the day the subject received the first dose of protocol therapy to the date of documented progressive disease by RECIST version 1.1 or death (regardless of cause), assessed at 6 months
Assessed and compared PFS-6 between gemcitabine/VX-970 and gemcitabine alone arms
Time frame: Up to 3 years
CBR is defined as the percentage of subjects achieving a response rating of stable disease >= 4 months, partial response (PR), or complete response (CR). Subject demographic and baseline characteristics will be summarized by mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables; and by counts and percentages for categorical variables. Summaries will be provided separately for each treatment group. Treatment group comparisons in CBR will be evaluated using logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios with associated 90% confidence intervals. In the event that rates are low, comparisons will be based on Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Objective response rate by platinum-free status includes only informational summaries (counts of participants who met the categories outlined below) without formal statistical comparisons.
Time frame: CA-125 serum samples were collected from participants in both Arms I and II at baseline, on Day 1 of each cycle, and at the end-of-study treatment visit, assessed up to 2 years.
Determined and compared CA125 reduction by > 50% between gemcitabine/VX-970 and gemcitabine alone arms.
Time frame: Number of weeks from the date of registration until date of death (regardless of cause), assessed up to 3 years.
Assessed and compared OS between gemcitabine/VX-970 and gemcitabine alone arms.
Time frame: AE checks occurred on D1 and D8 of each cycle for up to 2 years and at the Final Treatment Visit. Patients who were removed from study treatment for unacceptable AEs were followed until resolution/stabilization of the AE up to 3 years, or until death.
Determined and compared the safety profile of gemcitabine/VX-970 and gemcitabine alone regimens.
Time frame: Assessed for up to 3 years.
Duration of response was evaluated at the first instance of CR or PR through the earliest assessment of progressive disease, death, or the last follow-up where the subject had not yet progressed from her prior response. Informational summaries without formal statistical comparisons were produced.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Phase 2 Study of M6620 (VX-970) in Combination With Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Alone in Subjects With Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Fallopian Tube Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02446600
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03685695
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02520115
Adnexal Diseases, Adnexal Mass
Bay City, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02839707
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial Details