Women and Infants
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
NCT Number: NCT06771453
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the impact of a video educational tool on patient decisional conflict at the time when making a decision about prenatal genetic testing. The control group will receive standard prenatal care.
The secondary aims include assessing the impact of the video educational tool versus standard care on pregnant participants': perception of likelihood of having a baby affected by a genetic problem, intended plan for genetic testing, patient-provider communication, retention of prenatal genetics knowledge, and perception of genetic data privacy.
Participants will be asked to:
1. Watch video education (if randomized to this group) and complete a baseline survey at their dating ultrasound regarding knowledge of prenatal genetics, prior experiences, and demographics 2. Complete a follow up survey after seeing their prenatal care provider regarding: decisional conflict scale with respect to prenatal genetic testing decision (primary outcome), perception of likelihood of having a baby affected by a genetic problem (secondary outcome) and the type of genetic testing chosen (secondary outcome). 3. Complete a second follow up survey six to ten weeks from the second survey to assess: Provider patient communication, retention of genetics knowledge, patient recollection of testing performed, and self-reported out of pocket cost related to genetic testing.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Video education about prenatal genetics will include content regarding aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing options, how to make a values-based choice, and specifics of risks/benefits/limitations of each type of testing option.
Time frame: After enrollment and up to 14 days after their first obstetric appointment in that pregnancy
The investigators will assess the decisional conflict scale score around the time when patients make a decision about prenatal genetic screening options. The resulting score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating no decisional conflict (best outcome) and 100 indicating extremely high decisional conflict (worst outcome).
Time frame: After enrollment and up to 14 days after their first obstetric appointment in that pregnancy
The investigators will use a Likert scale to assess patient's perception of likelihood of having a baby affected by a genetic problem (score ranges from 1 [not likely at all] to 4 [very likely]).
Time frame: After enrollment and up to 14 days after their first obstetric appointment in that pregnancy
The investigators will assess the percent of participants who decide to pursue screening or diagnostic genetic testing options
Time frame: Six to ten weeks from follow up survey #1
The investigators will use a modified doctor-patient communication questionnaire to assess how patients perceived communication and comprehension of counseling with their prenatal care provider (score 0 to 8, with higher score reflecting better communication).
Time frame: Six to ten weeks from follow up survey #1
The investigators will assess prenatal genetics knowledge remote from the intervention to assess retention of its content (score 0 to 12 with a higher score reflecting more knowledge). The questionnaire was created by the investigators. It is six questions that query the participants on key content highlighted in the educational intervention; the content covered is also considered standard of care to receive in counseling in routine prenatal care (for those who were not randomized to the intervention).
Time frame: Six to ten weeks from follow up survey #1
The investigators will assess on a Likert scale how important privacy of participants' own genetic data and that of their baby were in making a decision about prenatal genetic testing (score 0 to 8 with higher score reflecting more importance)
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Other
The GEM Trial - Genetics Education and Equity in Maternal Fetal Medicine: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Impact of a Video Education Tool (VET) on Decisional Conflict Among Prenatal Patients
Acronym: GEM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03831256
Aneuploidy, Chromosome Aberrations
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07643896
22q11 Deletion Syndrome, 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04109846
Aneuploidy, Chromosome Aberrations
Sunnyvale, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05488236
Aneuploidy, Chromosome Aberrations
Lisbon, Portugal
View Trial Details