Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Fares Ayoub, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Haydee Rochits Cueto
CONTACT
Mohamed Othman, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Tara A Keihanian, MD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07723937
This prospective, single-center, observational feasibility and safety study will evaluate the use of the GelPOINT® Path transanal access platform during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the removal of colorectal polyps. The GelPOINT® Path system is designed to improve access, maintain stable insufflation, and enhance visualization during advanced endoscopic procedures.
The study will enroll adult patients undergoing ESD for eligible colorectal lesions. The primary objective is to evaluate the technical feasibility, procedural performance, and safety of GelPOINT® Path-assisted ESD. Procedural outcomes, including procedure speed, technical success, resection outcomes, and procedure-related adverse events, will be collected prospectively. Participants will receive standard clinical care and will be followed for approximately 4 weeks after the procedure to assess delayed adverse events.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Fares Ayoub, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Haydee Rochits Cueto
CONTACT
Mohamed Othman, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Tara A Keihanian, MD
CONTACT
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic technique that enables en bloc removal of large or complex colorectal lesions while preserving the bowel and reducing the need for surgical resection. Despite its advantages, colorectal ESD remains technically demanding because of limited visualization, unstable luminal distension, and restricted instrument maneuverability, particularly in the distal colon and rectum.
The GelPOINT® Path transanal access platform has been widely used in transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) to provide stable insufflation and improved access for rectal procedures. This study will evaluate whether incorporating the GelPOINT® Path platform into colorectal ESD can improve procedural efficiency while maintaining the safety and effectiveness of standard ESD.
This is a prospective, single-center, observational feasibility and safety study enrolling approximately 30 adult patients undergoing ESD for eligible colorectal lesions. All procedures will be performed by experienced advanced endoscopists as part of routine clinical care. The use of the GelPOINT® Path platform will be determined by the treating physician according to standard clinical practice. No experimental therapeutic interventions or deviations from routine clinical management will occur.
Clinical, procedural, pathological, and follow-up data will be collected prospectively using standardized case report forms. Outcomes will include technical success, procedure time, dissection speed, en bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, device performance, operator workload, and intraprocedural and delayed adverse events. Participants will be followed for approximately 4 weeks after the procedure to evaluate post-procedural safety.
The findings from this study are expected to provide important feasibility and safety data regarding the use of the GelPOINT® Path platform as an adjunct to colorectal ESD and may help guide the design of future comparative studies evaluating its clinical effectiveness.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: During the index procedure
Procedure speed, calculated as lesion surface area (cm²) divided by total procedure time (hours), to evaluate the technical performance of GelPOINT® Path-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Time frame: During the index procedure
Percentage of lesions resected en bloc (in a single piece).
Time frame: Pathology assessment following the index procedure (within approximately 2 weeks)
Percentage of lesions with histologically negative lateral and vertical margins following resection.
Time frame: During the index procedure
Incidence of intraprocedural adverse events, including muscularis propria injury, perforation, and bleeding.
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks after
Incidence of delayed adverse events, including delayed bleeding, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome, and other procedure-related complications.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Baylor College of Medicine
Other
GelPOINT® Path-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Polyps: A Feasibility and Safety Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07328308
Colon Cancer Prevention, Polyp Colorectal
Haifa, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT04979962
Adenoma Colon, Polyp Colorectal
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07146165
Adenoma Colon, Adenoma Colon Polyp
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07450612
Adenoma Colon, Adenoma Colon Polyp
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial Details