Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05908500

Gathering Evidence on Best Practices for Lay Rescuer CPR Training

The goal of this prospective trial is to compare CPR skill and attitudes in lay rescuers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

* What is the optimal training timing, duration, and frequency for lay rescuers that leads to CPR skill retention? * What is the impact of CPR manikin type (high-fidelity, inflatable, nontraditional objects) on skill retention? * How do specific features of training modality -- such as contextualization, gamification, and emotional engagement -- impact skill proficiency, knowledge retention, and attitudes about CPR?

Participants will

* Answer pre-training questionnaires * Participate in CPR training * Participate in CPR skills testing * Answer post-training questionnaires

Researchers will compare different methods of training, different frequencies of training, and different manikin types.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Nevada Reno

Reno, Nevada, 89557, United States

Location contact

Lorrel Toft

CONTACT

[email protected]

4103028456

Lorrel Toft, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health crisis in the United States, with over 350,000 cases annually and low survival rates. Lay rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can double survival, yet widespread gaps in training access, skill retention, and emotional readiness persist. While most U.S. states mandate high school CPR training, implementation quality varies, and traditional formats have remained unchanged for over 60 years. These methods are often time-consuming, expensive, and poorly suited for adolescents, leading to low participation and rapid skill decay.

This study addresses these critical gaps by comparing various CPR training methods and procedures. The project tests the effectiveness of different training frequencies, durations, and delivery modes-including traditional instructor-led sessions, brief refreshers, and a novel, emotionally immersive serious game. The serious game leverages gamification, competition, and scenario-based learning to build "emotional muscle memory" and prepare students for real-world emergencies.

Participants are enrolled from two high schools-one rural, one suburban-and randomized by class or individual into training arms with varied schedules and compression practice tools. These tools range from high-fidelity manikins to low-fidelity devices and improvised household objects. Outcomes include CPR performance metrics (compression rate, depth, recoil, and hand placement), knowledge retention, emotional engagement (measured via validated psychometric scales), and confidence in responding to cardiac arrest.

Training sessions are delivered during the academic year, and students are assessed immediately after training and again at annual follow-up points. Data are collected in a de-identified format using school-issued ID numbers, ensuring participant confidentiality. Analysis will use generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects models to assess the impact of training method and frequency on skill retention and psychosocial readiness. The study also explores the role of contextualization, emotional engagement, and gamification as mediators of improved CPR performance.

Ultimately, this multi-year trial aims to identify scalable, cost-effective strategies that optimize CPR training outcomes for lay rescuers. By improving technical skill retention and emotional preparedness, the study addresses key priorities for public health impact and aligns with NHLBI's strategic goals to reduce mortality from sudden cardiac arrest.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All students at participating schools

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous CPR training (will be included in the CPR training but excluded from analysis)
  • Physical injury which prevents performing CPR
  • Student or parent opt-out

Treatment and study plan

CPR Training

Behavioral

Various durations and frequencies of CPR training

CPR Manikin Type

Device

Various types of CPR manikins are compared

Primary outcomes

  1. CPR Skill Retention

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    High-quality CPR as measured by compression rate (per minute), depth (inches), and correct hand placement. High-quality CPR is defined as correct rate (100-120/min) AND >70% of compressions at appropriate depth (2-2.4inches) with appropriate hand placement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. CPR Attitudes

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    Participant confidence and intention to perform CPR, measured using Likert-scale items and validated engagement questionnaires.

  2. CPR Knowledge Retention

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    Percentage of correct answers on a standardized multiple-choice test assessing CPR knowledge and AED use.

  3. Emotional Profile

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    Emotional responses captured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), measuring affective realism and readiness.

  4. Learner Engagement

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    Subjective engagement and perceived relevance of CPR training, measured via Likert scales and the Narrative Engagement Scale.

Other outcomes

  1. Training Feature Effects (Contextualization, Gamification, Emotional Impact)

    Time frame: 1-4 years

    Exploratory outcome assessing how specific training design elements influence CPR skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy through mediation and regression analyses.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lorrel Toft, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

4103028456

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Nevada, Reno

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Generating Evidence to Optimize Lay Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training: a Longitudinal Study of Frequency, Modality, and Design Features Impacting Skill Retention

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2031
First posted
Jun 18, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.