Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07556237

Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Abdominal Pain in Patients With Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying and symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) using the implanted Enterra™ neurostimulator is FDA-approved to treat nausea and vomiting but its impact on abdominal pain has not been well studied. This study evaluates whether alternative programming parameters of the Enterra™ device can reduce abdominal pain in patients with gastroparesis. Participants with an existing Enterra™ device will be randomized to one of three stimulation settings and followed for assessment of pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and medication use.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Louisville Clinical Trials Unit

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location contact

Thomas L Abell, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

502-588-4600

About this study

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, three-arm parallel clinical trial in adults with gastroparesis who have an implanted Enterra™ gastric neurostimulator. All participants will complete a two-week run-in period using their baseline clinical device settings prior to randomization. Participants will then be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three gastric electrical stimulation parameter sets: standard nominal parameters (active control), special short-cycle parameters, or modified Enterra parameters delivered continuously. Participants will remain on their assigned blinded settings for eight weeks, during which validated patient-reported measures of abdominal pain, gastroparesis symptoms, quality of life, and pain medication use will be collected. After completion of blinded endpoint assessments, participants may select their preferred settings for an additional eight-week follow-up period. Optional substudy assessments include gastric function testing, inflammatory biomarker analysis, and autonomic nervous system testing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosed gastroparesis.
  • Implanted Enterra™ device for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Chronic daily abdominal pain of gastric origin lasting more than 2 months.
  • Average pain score ≥4 on a 0-10 scale.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Daily opioid use.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Abdominal pain not attributed to gastric/visceral origin.
  • Severe constipation or uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >10).
  • Other medical conditions that would interfere with study participation.

Treatment and study plan

Enterra™ neurostimulator

Device

Gastric Electrical Stimulation using implanted Enterra™ neurostimulator with protocol-specified programming parameters.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Abdominal Pain Score

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks after randomization.

    Change from baseline in seven-day average of daily worst abdominal pain score measured using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Brief Pain Inventory Score

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks after randomization.

    Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score from baseline to 8 weeks after randomization. The investigators will be using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form.

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scoring assesses pain severity and its interference with daily life using an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = "no pain/interference", 10 = "worst pain/complete interference").

    It provides two main scores: a Pain Severity Score (average of 4 items) and a Pain Interference Score (average of 7 items), where higher scores indicate greater impairment.

  2. Change in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks after randomization

    Change in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score from baseline to 8 weeks after randomization. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) is a patient-reported tool measuring the severity of gastroparesis symptoms over 2 weeks, assessing 9 items group into 3 subclasses: nausea/vomiting, fullness/early satiety, and bloating on a 0-5 scale. A total GCSI score ≥18 generally indicates moderate to severe symptoms, with lower scores indicating better symptom control.

  3. Change in Pain Medications

    Time frame: During the 8-week randomized treatment period.

    Change in use of opioid and non-opioid pain medications during the 8-week randomized treatment period.

  4. Percent Reduction in Pain Score

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks.

    Percent of responders defined as ≥30% reduction in pain score at 8 weeks.

    The investigators will be using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scoring assesses pain severity and its interference with daily life using an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = "no pain/interference", 10 = "worst pain/complete interference"). It provides two main scores: a Pain Severity Score (average of 4 items) and a Pain Interference Score (average of 7 items), where higher scores indicate greater impairment.

  5. Change in Inflammatory Cytokines

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks.

    Measured via serum testing including including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and IFN-γ.

  6. Change in Autonomic Function

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

    For measurements of autonomic function, participants will undergo traditional autonomic testing, an established technique that has been extensively applied. This testing is reported a two main components: Vagal Cholinergic, via RR variation with deep breathing and Valsalva Ratio as well as Sympathetic Adrenergic, via postural adjustment ratio and vasoconstriction to cold stress.

    The normal values for these are derived from extensive experience of nearly 3000 patients as well as normal controls. This testing is also performed with cutaneous electrograms, used as a combined autonomic enteric tool, for baseline, and response to cold and posture.

  7. Change in Gastric Electrophysiology

    Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks

    Measured via electrogastrogram (EGG). The investigators will record mucosal and serosal measures at the time of placement of temporary GES electrodes, and before a temporary GES device is connected to the leads. The technique of mucosal electrogram recordings uses 2 leads, a proximal one in the upper gastric body and a distal one near the body antral junction, which allows for low resolution mapping of the stomach. The recordings will be analyzed by signal averaging and reported as frequency, amplitude and their ratio. All patients will also have baseline cutaneous electrograms as well, for reference, analyzed in a similar manner.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Thomas L Abell, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

502-588-4600

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Louisville

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Acronym: HEAL

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Apr 29, 2026
Registry last updated
May 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.