Sechenov University Clinic#4
Moscow, 119991, Russia
NCT Number: NCT07019701
The COVID-19 pandemic has become a huge global problem, affecting all spheres of human life, resulting in enormous social, economic consequences and human tragedies. With very decent results of treatment of patients of average severity in the conditions of bed units, the results of treatment of the most severe category - patients of intensive care units who required tracheal intubation remain extremely unsatisfactory. According to different data, mortality in this category of patients reaches 80-90%. However, observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown high efficiency of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas, reaching 50-60%. Some pilot bench studies (on manikins) have shown the advantages of high-flow oxygen therapy over standard oxygen therapy in reducing anatomical dead space and preserving a given inspiratory fraction of oxygen in the laryngeal pharynx of the manikin, but the actual state of the laryngeal pharyngeal gas composition was not studied. Some patients breathe through open mouth that decreases the efficacy oh high flow oxygen through nasal cannula. The aim of the study is to measure the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) oxygen fractions and the inspiratory and expiratory carbon dioxide fractions (FiCO2 and FeCO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and during standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask under different physiological conditions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Moscow, 119991, Russia
Randomized controlled trials showed reduction of tracheal intubation in high- flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula group in patients with acute respiratory failure as compared to standard oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation before Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic of COVID-19 on March 11th, 2020. Since then observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas (HFNC), reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Bench studies showed the advantages of HFNC compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx during HFNC was not studied. Some patients breathe through open mouth that decreases the efficacy oh high flow oxygen through nasal cannula.
The aim of the study is to measure the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) oxygen fractions and the inspiratory and expiratory carbon dioxide fractions (FiCO2 and FeCO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and during standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask under different physiological conditions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the hypopharynx during high flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Expiratory oxygen fraction (FeO2) in the hypopharynx during high flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Expiratory fraction of carbon dioxide (FeCO2) in the hypopharynx during high flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Respiratory rate (RR)
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
The ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry/inspiratory oxygen fraction to respiratory rate (ROX-index) during different physiological conditions
Time frame: 5 minutes after the start of each combination of breathing pattern, device type, fraction of inspired oxygen and preset flow
Visual-analog scale (VAS) for comfort evaluation (from 1 to 10, 1-full comfort, 10-full comfort)
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Other
Gas Composition in the Hypopharynx During High-flow Oxygen Therapy Through Nasal Cannula or Face Mask, or During Standard Oxygen Therapy Through a Non-Rebreather Face Mask in Healthy Volunteers
Acronym: O2-OXIMETRY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05447078
Healthy Volunteers, Infections
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07513532
Healthy Volunteers
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090655
Healthy Volunteers
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT01915212
Communicable Diseases, DNA Virus Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details