Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01961089

Galilei Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study

Study question: How does the new GALILEI Lens Professional compare to predicate devices? Study hypothesis: The GALILEI Lens Professional achieves a better precision in the postoperative, calculated target refraction with cataract surgeries than predicate devices, and it is more versatile in the measurable parameters as well as more user-friendly.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eye Clinic Orasis

Reinach, Canton of Aargau, 5734, Switzerland

About this study

Background: An accessory to the commercially available GALILEI Dual-Scheimpflug Corneal Topographer/Keratometer with the name "EBR Accessory" was developed by the company Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG for the measurement of intraocular distances. The combination is called "GALILEI Lens Professional". The measurement principle is based on on short coherence interferometry/-reflectometry, which has gained wide-spread application and has been applied clinically, including one of the members of this study group, for the precise measurement of axial, intraocular distances (12.1.). Such EBR Accessory measurements, in combination with measurements by the GALILEI, may be applied to given intra-ocular lens (IOL) types and IOL equations, an permit the calculation of suggested IOLs that are implanted during cataract surgery, in order to achieve the desired vision correction. To register this accessory for sale, the precision and agreement to existing devices with similar applications ("predicate devices") must be demonstrated. One complete measurement consists of a cornea-topography/keratometry scan, followed immediately by three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the anterior segment (cornea and crystalline lens) and - after a short re-alignment - three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the retina. The measurement process is continuous, but divided in two steps. Blinking by the patient is possible in between the two steps, which increases patient comfort and, in certain cases, measurement success. Precision is evaluated by three repeated, complete measurements with the GALILEI Lens Professional and each predicate device. Two standard devices with comparable optical technology that are used in routine cataract surgery were declared as predicate devices. These two devise are typically used in combination with standard keratometers, as which the GALILEI Lens Professional may be employed as well.

Goal: The comparison of the GALILEI Lens Professional to predicate devices with respect to precision in measuring postoperative, calculated target refractions in cataract patients, and versatility of measurable quantities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • spherical equivalent between -10 D and +10 D
  • best-corrected VA of 20/100 or better.

Exclusion criteria

  • strabism
  • blepharitis
  • nystagmus
  • amblyopia
  • anisometropia (spherical equivalent > 1D)
  • angle closure glaucoma
  • seizure disorder
  • brain damages
  • Down syndrome
  • trisomy 13 or 18
  • cerebral palsy
  • other serious disorders of the eye or central nervous systems

Treatment and study plan

Galilei Lens Professional

Device

Measurement device

IOLMaster

Device

Measurement device

Lenstar

Device

Measurement device

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 1

    Time frame: 3 months

    Assessed parameters:

    Axial Length (AL; G6, IOLM, LS) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT; G6, LS)) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD; G6, IOLM, LS) Lens Thickness (LT; G6, LS) Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS) White-to-White (WtW; G6, IOL, LS)

  2. Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 2

    Time frame: 3 months

    Assessed Parameters:

    Simulated Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Agreement With Devices of the Same Type in Terms of Repeatability

    Time frame: 3 months

    Assessed parameters:

    Axial Length (AL) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) Lens Thickness (LT) Corneal Curvature (SimK) White-to-White (WtW)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Oct 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 8, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.