Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06483815

Fungal Infections During and After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Retrospective Comparison

his study aims to retrospectively compare fungal positivity rates between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the post-pandemic periods. During the pandemic, Candida species had a positivity rate of 17.36%, and Aspergillus had a rate of 2.22%. Post-pandemic, these rates decreased to 9.29% and 1.00%, respectively. The overall fungal positivity rate decreased from 9.15% during the pandemic to 5.13% post-pandemic. Statistical analysis revealed a significant decrease in fungal positivity rates post-pandemic (p < 0.01). These findings underscore the effectiveness of post-pandemic healthcare interventions and infection control strategies.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hisar Hospital Intercontinental

Istanbul, 34768, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The study aims to retrospectively compare fungal positivity rates by focusing on Candida and Aspergillus species during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and in the post-pandemic period. The dataset includes samples collected during the pandemic period (N=623) and the subsequent post-pandemic period (N=818). Fungal positivity rates were calculated and statistically analyzed using chi-square tests, and significance was determined as p<0.01.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Candida species showed a positivity rate of 17.36%, while the rate in the post-pandemic period significantly decreased to 9.29% (p=0.002). In contrast, Aspergillus species did not show a significant change in positivity rates between the pandemic (2.22%) and post-pandemic (1.00%) periods (p=0.186, NS).

Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology of fungal infections during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, suggesting possible shifts in fungal pathogen prevalence and healthcare priorities. The findings contribute to the development of targeted healthcare strategies and surveillance measures for fungal infections in the post-pandemic era.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative analysis

Data Analysis: Chi-square tests, p<0.01 considered significant

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients over 18 years of age of both genders

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 18 years of age,
  • Patients whose demographic, clinical and laboratory data investigated in the study could not be accessed, patients who were diagnosed with fungal infection during hospitalization

Treatment and study plan

Culture, İsolation

Diagnostic Test

Data on patient demographics, clinical conditions, and fungal infection positivity rates were extracted from hospital records. Fungal positivity rates were calculated based on laboratory results and presented as percentages. Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-Square test, and p-values were reported.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fungal positivity rates during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period and post-pandemic period

    Time frame: 2020-2024

    Fungal infection data from samples of patients, 623 of whom were during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and 818 of whom were in the post-epidemic period, were retrospectively examined. Fungal positivity rates for different fungal agents such as Candida species and Aspergillus were calculated separately and compared statistically.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bekir Sami Uyanık

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Fungal Positivity Rates During and Post-SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Periods

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 3, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.