Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00600223

Functional Voice and Speech Outcomes Following Surgical Voice Restorations: A Comparison of Pharyngeal Construction Approaches

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and quality of speech after removal of the voice box and all or part of the swallowing tube.

The study is evaluating which type of surgery provides patients with the best speech and voice.

These data will be used to help surgeons to design better ways to restore voice function after removal of the voice box. Information about disease, its treatment, quality of life, and physical and vocal function will be collected. An audio recording of vocal tasks will also be done. All of this information will be analyzed and the two different subject groups will be compared to see if there are differences.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, 10065, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who have undergone removal of the larynx and the entire pharynx by either traditional reconstruction or more advanced reconstructive techniques, which involve the use of tissue, such as skin or bowel, from other parts of the body. There is no time frame for reconstruction. All subjects who have previously undergone reconstruction are eligible.
  • Subjects who use the tracheoesophageal puncture method of voice restoration as their primary communication technique.
  • > or equal to 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not have functional voice restoration.
  • Do not speak English as a functional language.

Treatment and study plan

questionnaires and standardized, digital voice recording

Behavioral

Patient will be asked to complete four sets of forms. Upon completion of these forms, the study subject and the investigator will proceed to a quiet room for the standardized, digital voice recording. Recording will be made on digital audiotape using a standardized portable, digital audio recorder.

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine the pertinent differences in objective and subjective voice parameters between PR techniques, specifically comparing those techniques that provide mucosal lining (jejunum) to those with cutaneous lining (radial forearm flap).

    Time frame: conclusion of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Provide physician with meaningful and relevant data upon which to base the optimal choice of pharyngeal reconstruction method for individual patients who must undergo laryngectomy with pharyngeal reconstruction for the treatment of carcinoma.

    Time frame: conclusion of study

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Registry information

Official study title

Functional Voice and Speech Outcomes Following Surgical Voice Restorations: A Comparison of Pharyngeal Reconstruction Approaches

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jan 24, 2008
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.