ankle arthroscopy with ORIF
Procedurewe will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
Other names: ankle fracture fixation with arthroscopy
NCT Number: NCT06086223
The aim of our study is to identify if there is statistically significant difference in patient reported functional outcomes in cases of unstable ankle fracture managed by ORIF with and without ankle arthroscopy.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Acute ankle fracture is one of the commonest fractures of the lower limb. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation remain the main surgical treatment for unstable ankle fractures . However, its final outcomes are not as good as expected . Fracture malunion, failure to address the disrupted syndesmosis and associated ligamentous or chondral lesions can be reasons for poor surgical outcome.
1-mm of lateral talar shift lead to a 42% increase in contact stress, so the anatomic reduction is critical to the long-term integrity of the joint . It is difficult to assess 1 to 2 mm of mal-reduction with C-arm fluoroscopy. The best assessment of the syndesmotic reduction is performed with axial CT imaging of the ankle.
Ankle arthroscopy is expected to be a more sensitive tool for syndesmotic disruption diagnosis and other intra-articular pathologies and as a guide for anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis . Several studies have reported the incidence of chondral lesions seen during ankle arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture ORIF, but those studies report the role of arthroscopy as a diagnostic or predictive tool for patient outcome. Very few studies have discussed the rates of arthroscopic intervention, the procedures performed, and the association of these procedures with patient final functional outcomes .
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pediatric fractures, Polytrauma patients, Fractures managed with closed-contact casting and, patients with lost follow up during this study
we will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
Other names: ankle fracture fixation with arthroscopy
we will go for fixation of the fracture alone with no scope intervention
Other names: ankle fracture fixation without arthroscopy
Time frame: 6 months and one year follow up
AOFAS hindfoot score difference between the 2 groups at 6 months and one year postoperatively from 0 to 100 where higher value indicates better functional outcomes
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Assiut University
Other
Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy: Randomized Control Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07620015
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Kyrenia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT05729542
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04473638
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07693933
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details