Open Reduction Internal Fixation superior plate
Procedure3.5mm superior reconstruction plate
NCT Number: NCT03533634
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture treated with to different techniques. the first one was placing a 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the superior side of the clavicle and the second one placing the same 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the anteroinferior side of the clavicle. the patients had the same rehabilitation program and evaluated with functional scores at 30, 60, 90 and 365 days after surgery. biomechanical studies have demonstrated more stable construct using an anteroinferior plate in clavicle fractures and we were trying to find out if it has a clinical relevance in patients with midshaft clavicle fractures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture treated with to different techniques.
the first technique was placing a 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the superior side of the clavicle and the second one placing the same 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the anteroinferior side of the clavicle.
the patients had the same rehabilitation program and evaluated with Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand functional outcome score and Visual Analogue Score for pain at 30, 60, 90 and 365 days after surgery.
biomechanical studies have demonstrated more stable construct using an anteroinferior plate in clavicle fractures and we were trying to find out if it has a clinical relevance in patients with midshaft clavicle fractures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
3.5mm superior reconstruction plate
3.5mm anteroinferior reconstruction plate
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 60 days after surgery
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 365 days after surgery
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 60 days after surgery
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 365 days after surgery
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
UMAE Hospital de Traumatologia y Ortopedia de Puebla
Other
Functional Outcome in Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Patients, Treated With Superior Versus Anteroinferior Reconstruction Plate. Randomized Clinical Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.