Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03440632

Functional Electrical Stimulation During Walking in Cerebral Palsy

Children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) often walk with insufficient ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase. A pathological gait, known as drop-foot gait, can be the result and this has 2 major complications: foot-slap during loading response and toe-drag during swing. This is partly caused by weakness of the anterior tibial muscle and partly due to co-contraction of both the fibular- and anterior tibial muscle. For classification of gait, the Winters scale can be used, where unilateral CP with dropfoot is classified as type I.

In daily life these problems cause limited walking distance and frequent falls, leading to restrictions in participating in daily life. The current guideline for spastic cerebral palsy describes the following therapies: 1) conservative therapy (physiotherapy, orthopaedic shoes and orthoses) 2) drugs suppressing spasticity 3) surgical interventions.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may be an effective alternative treatment for children with spastic CP and a drop foot. By stimulating the fibular nerve or the anterior tibial muscle directly during the swing phase, dorsiflexion of the foot is stimulated. In contrast to bracing, FES does not restrict motion, but does produce muscle contraction, and thus has the potential to increase strength and motor control through repetitive neural stimulation over time.

In a systematic review the investigators found that FES immediately improves ankle dorsal flexion and reduces falls and these effects also sustain. However, it should be noted that the level of evidence is limited. Until now, the use of FES in CP is limited and no data exist about the effects on walking distance (activity level) and participation level.

The overall objective of this study is to conduct a randomised cross-over intervention trial in children with unilateral spastic CP with 12 weeks of FES (for every participant) and 18 weeks of conventional therapy. The effectiveness of FES will be examined at participation leven, using individual goal attainment. Next to that the effect at gait will be measured. An additional goal is to investigate the cost effectiveness of FES, which, in case of a positive effect, may support allowance by insurance companies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Children with spastic cerebral palsy often walk with insufficient ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase or with eversion of the foot. A pathological gait, known as drop-foot gait, can be the result and this has 2 major complications: foot-slap during loading response and toe-drag during swing. This is partly caused by weakness of the anterior tibial muscle and partly due to co-contraction of both the fibular- and anterior tibial muscle. In time, the disorder appears to be progressive due to atrophy and contractures of the muscle and increasing bodyweight. For classification of gait, the Winters scale can be used, where unilateral CP with dropfoot is classified as type I.

In daily life these problems cause limited walking distance and frequent falls. This can lead to restrictions in participating in daily activities at school and in leisure. The current guideline for spastic cerebral palsy describes the following therapies: 1) conservative therapy, which includes physiotherapy, orthopaedic shoes and orthoses. 2) systemically and locally applied drugs suppressing spasticity. 3) surgical interventions, e.g. tenotomy, transposition and osteotomy. In each intervention, there is the risk of side effects, such as sedation with oral medications, pressure sores and atrophy in a static orthosis, temporary effect in a Botulinum toxin A treatment and surgical complications due to a result of the surgery, and on the other hand as a result of the execution.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may be an effective alternative treatment for children with spastic CP and a drop foot. By stimulating the fibular nerve or the anterior tibial muscle directly during the swing phase, dorsiflexion of the foot is stimulated. In contrast to bracing, FES does not restrict motion, but does produce muscle contraction, and thus has the potential to increase strength and motor control through repetitive neural stimulation over time.

In a systematic review the investigators found that FES immediately improves ankle dorsal flexion and falls. In addition, longer sustained effects of FES on ankle dorsal flexion and falls are found. However, it should be noted only two study studies (4 articles) were of level II class evidence (small RCT) and all other studies used a single subject design. Until now, the use of FES in CP is limited and no data exist about the effects on walking distance (activity level) and participation level.

The overall objective of this study is to conduct a randomised cross-over intervention trial in children with unilateral spastic CP with 12 weeks of FES for every participant and 18 weeks of conventional therapy. The effectiveness of FES will be examined at participation leven, using individual goal attainment. With every individual a goal at walking distance will be set, next to possible other goals. Next to that, results will be measured at the activity and functional level: the effect at gait kinematics (such as ankle dorsiflexion and balance), walking distance, falls, spasticity and muscle force. The type of brain damage of the patients is also taken in to account. An addition al goal is to investigate the cost effectiveness of FES, which, in case of a positive effect, may support allowance by insurance companies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral foot drop of central origin, particularly the absence of initial heel contact
  • Participants are currently treated with ankle-foot orthoses or (adapted) shoes to wear on a daily basis
  • Participants ambulate independently, and thus classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I or II and have a gait type 1 according to Winters et al (4).
  • Participants are able to walk for at least 15 minutes
  • Confirmed cerebral abnormality with MRI (showing medial infarction, maldevelopment of the brain, or porencephaly).
  • Participants are aged 4-18 years at time of inclusion

Exclusion criteria

  • Plantarflexion ankle contracture of more than 5 degrees plantarflexion with the knee extended
  • Botulinum toxin A injection to the plantar or dorsiflexor muscle groups within the 6 months before the study
  • Orthopaedic surgery to the legs in the previous year
  • Uncontrolled epilepsy with daily seizures

Treatment and study plan

FES

Device

Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking, using a (superficial) neurostimulator with tilt sensor.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in goal attainment scale (GAS)

    Time frame: Setting of goal(s) at start, assessment at every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    Goal attainment scale: definition of an individual goal at start, followed by a 6- point numeric scale indicating to what extent the goal is (score 0 till +2) or is not (-3 indicating detoriation till -1) reached.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in participation

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    as measured in the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (see reference).

  2. Change in walking distance

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    Measured by the 6 minute walking test and the functional mobility scale (3 items, 6-point rating scale).

  3. Change in physical activity

    Time frame: assessment at start and end of a phase (except for the wash-out phase): week 12 and 30.

    measured by activity monitor

  4. Change in frequency of falling

    Time frame: assessment at every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured by a questionnaire

  5. Change in stability during walking

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured by variation of center of mass and margins of stability assessed during 3D gait analysis

  6. Change in ankle dorsiflexion angle

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured in degrees during gait analysis during 3D gait analysis

  7. Change in calf muscle activation

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    Assessed by spasticity measurement and electromyography (EMG) during 3D gait analysis

  8. Change in ankle plantarflexion strength during walking

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    Calculated by net push off moments during 3D gait analysis

  9. Change in ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured in Newton by handheld dynamometer

  10. Change in feelings about donning and doffing

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured by a questionnaire

  11. Change in patient satisfaction

    Time frame: assessment at start and every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    measured by a visual analogue scale with smileys (0 = unsatisfied, 6 = perfectly satisfied).

  12. The compliance and acceptability of FES

    Time frame: the FES devices measures this automatically during wearing; so this will happen during the 12 weeks of FES therapy

    derived from delivered stimulations and hours of wear time in the log file

  13. Type of brain lesion in relation to FES success

    Time frame: Assessment and analysis of available imaging will be done after completion of the study by the patient, so after week 30, up to week 50 to collect a batch of finished patients. No imaging will be performed because of the study.

    Derived from available brain imaging

  14. Cost-effectiveness of FES

    Time frame: analysis after study completion, week 30, using the EQ-5D-Y results.

    compared to conventional therapy

  15. Change in health

    Time frame: assessment at every end of a phase: week 12, 18 and 30.

    EQ-5D-Y Questionnaire, youth version

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Ankle Dorsiflexors During Walking in Children With Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy: a Randomized Crossover Intervention Study

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.