Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02530723

Functional Changes and Power Training in Older Women.

Extending quality of life and attenuating functional decline is paramount in older adults. This study investigates the effects of low-intensity power-training in older women and its effects on functional outcomes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Athletic Centre; 55 Harbord Street

Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2W6, Canada

About this study

Resistance training has gained popularity in aging interventions since it is effective in countering the loss of muscle mass and strength with senescence. Traditionally, strength training (ST) protocols for the elderly have involved relatively heavy loads (70-80% of maximum force) with the focus being on increasing strength. There is some evidence of increased function after strength training albeit with inconsistent reports in the literature. More recently, several studies have designed resistance training programs that aim to increase power rather than strength, since findings indicate that measures of power are better predictors of physical function than measures of strength. In other words, improving power may be more beneficial to the elderly who are susceptible to functional limitations, mobility disability, and dependency. Since it is difficult to produce a great deal of power with increasing intensities, and lifting heavy loads may not be relevant to everyday functioning in the elderly, studies have investigated training for improvements in power rather than the traditional improvements in strength.

The effects of power training (PT) versus ST on functional outcomes in older adults have varied, with some studies showing enhanced improvements in function, and others showing no difference in function compared to regular ST or compared to other interventions such as walking. Discrepancies might be the result of the variety of functional tests used, mode of training, variable frequency of sessions per week, differences in study length, and adults of varying functional status. It has been suggested that perhaps the standard 3-sessions-per-week frequency may not be optimal for the elderly. A previous investigation demonstrated that the effects from PT at 40% of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM: the highest amount that can be lifted once) in older adults was comparable to the effects from ST at 80% 1RM with improvements being similar between the two modes despite the lower daily ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) reported with PT (PT: RPE for leg press (12.2) and knee extension (14.6) vs ST: RPE for leg press (15.1) and knee extension (17)). Therefore, an 'easier' exercise training experience did not result in sacrifices in gains of strength and power. In theory, these factors (lighter loads, lower perceived exertions, similar strength and power gains) could affect adherence to exercise during and after a research-related exercise intervention has been completed and thus are important considerations in the design of a training program.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of low-intensity (40% 1RM) PT on functional outcomes in older women.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • females, 65 years of age
  • agree to the study protocol
  • give informed-consent to the proposed research study

Exclusion criteria

  • existing acute illness/disease (last six months)
  • diagnosed with myopathies
  • currently prescribed cardiovascular medications or drugs that may affect muscle mass and/or their response to exercise (thyroid medications, sedatives, beta blockers, some statins)
  • are diabetic
  • have uncontrolled hypertension
  • have been advised against participating in exercise by their doctor

Treatment and study plan

Power Training

Other

Resistance training machines with CAM devices will be used for training.

Other names: resistance training, high-speed training, high-velocity training

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Stair-climb power

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    The time needed to ascend a flight of stairs, converted to power (using body-weight and stair height)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 400-meter walk test

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    The time needed to walk 400 meters (back and forth along a 20 meter course)

  2. Change in Short Physical Performance Battery

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    A short test of balance, walking, and chair stand ability

  3. Change in 30-second chair stand test

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    The number of chair stands possible in 30 seconds

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Toronto

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Low-intensity Power Training on Strength, Power, and Functional Outcomes in Older, Community-dwelling Women.

Acronym: F-POW

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 21, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 9, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.