Athletic Centre; 55 Harbord Street
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2W6, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02530723
Extending quality of life and attenuating functional decline is paramount in older adults. This study investigates the effects of low-intensity power-training in older women and its effects on functional outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2W6, Canada
Resistance training has gained popularity in aging interventions since it is effective in countering the loss of muscle mass and strength with senescence. Traditionally, strength training (ST) protocols for the elderly have involved relatively heavy loads (70-80% of maximum force) with the focus being on increasing strength. There is some evidence of increased function after strength training albeit with inconsistent reports in the literature. More recently, several studies have designed resistance training programs that aim to increase power rather than strength, since findings indicate that measures of power are better predictors of physical function than measures of strength. In other words, improving power may be more beneficial to the elderly who are susceptible to functional limitations, mobility disability, and dependency. Since it is difficult to produce a great deal of power with increasing intensities, and lifting heavy loads may not be relevant to everyday functioning in the elderly, studies have investigated training for improvements in power rather than the traditional improvements in strength.
The effects of power training (PT) versus ST on functional outcomes in older adults have varied, with some studies showing enhanced improvements in function, and others showing no difference in function compared to regular ST or compared to other interventions such as walking. Discrepancies might be the result of the variety of functional tests used, mode of training, variable frequency of sessions per week, differences in study length, and adults of varying functional status. It has been suggested that perhaps the standard 3-sessions-per-week frequency may not be optimal for the elderly. A previous investigation demonstrated that the effects from PT at 40% of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM: the highest amount that can be lifted once) in older adults was comparable to the effects from ST at 80% 1RM with improvements being similar between the two modes despite the lower daily ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) reported with PT (PT: RPE for leg press (12.2) and knee extension (14.6) vs ST: RPE for leg press (15.1) and knee extension (17)). Therefore, an 'easier' exercise training experience did not result in sacrifices in gains of strength and power. In theory, these factors (lighter loads, lower perceived exertions, similar strength and power gains) could affect adherence to exercise during and after a research-related exercise intervention has been completed and thus are important considerations in the design of a training program.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of low-intensity (40% 1RM) PT on functional outcomes in older women.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Resistance training machines with CAM devices will be used for training.
Other names: resistance training, high-speed training, high-velocity training
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
The time needed to ascend a flight of stairs, converted to power (using body-weight and stair height)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
The time needed to walk 400 meters (back and forth along a 20 meter course)
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
A short test of balance, walking, and chair stand ability
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
The number of chair stands possible in 30 seconds
University of Toronto
Other
The Effects of Low-intensity Power Training on Strength, Power, and Functional Outcomes in Older, Community-dwelling Women.
Acronym: F-POW
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05258500
Atrophy, Brain Diseases
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07275177
Age-Related Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass, Aging
Miahuatlán de Porfirio Díaz, Oaxaca, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT03452488
Atrophy, Gait Disorders in Old Age
Banning, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03347656
Atrophy, Brain Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details