Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07606404

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: A Comparison of Ten Techniques

This study compares ten modern vitreoretinal surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the surgical approaches during pars plana vitrectomy, using stratified randomization based on macular hole size to ensure balanced groups. The main goal is to determine which technique provides the highest anatomical closure rate on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best visual outcomes. Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery to assess OCT findings, visual acuity, safety outcomes, and the need for reoperation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Almaty, 050042, Kazakhstan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Sanzhar Sambet, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+77758719834

About this study

Full-thickness macular hole is a vision-threatening condition that is commonly treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. While standard approaches achieve high closure rates in many cases, outcomes may vary depending on macular hole size and OCT morphology, and advanced surgical strategies (e.g., different ILM flap configurations, adjunctive biologic augmentation, hydrodissection, or grafting techniques) are increasingly used in clinical practice.

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare ten PPV-based surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Eligible participants will include adults with full-thickness macular hole across a broad range of minimum linear diameter (MLD), including MLD <250 µm. After eligibility confirmation and informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of the ten procedure groups. Randomization will be stratified by macular hole size into five predefined MLD strata to ensure balanced distribution of hole sizes across all intervention groups. Postoperative care and follow-up procedures will be standardized across groups according to the study protocol.

Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery and will include clinical examinations and OCT imaging. The primary endpoint is anatomical macular hole closure on OCT at the prespecified primary time point. Secondary endpoints include best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT-based morphologic recovery parameters, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, and adverse event information through Year 1. The study aims to generate evidence to guide selection of surgical technique based on macular hole morphometric and clinical characteristics while maintaining patient safety.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged ≥18 years.

Full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) eligible for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Symptom duration ≤12 months.

Clear ocular media sufficient for high-quality OCT imaging.

No prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

No severe foveal atrophy on OCT.

Able and willing to comply with postoperative positioning and follow-up visits.

Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion criteria

A. Etiology-Related / Secondary Macular Holes:

Traumatic macular hole.

High myopia with posterior staphyloma (axial length >28 mm and/or spherical equivalent ≤-8.0 D).

Diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) or significant tractional maculopathy.

Retinal vascular occlusion-related macular hole.

Uveitis-related macular hole.

Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with foveal atrophy.

B. Prior Interventions:

Any prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

C. Ocular Conditions That May Affect Outcomes or Safety:

Active or recent ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., uveitis, endophthalmitis, keratitis).

Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure >28 mmHg despite treatment).

Media opacity precluding adequate OCT (e.g., dense cataract or corneal opacity).

Geographic atrophy involving the fovea.

Treatment and study plan

Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

Procedure

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.

Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

Biological

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.

Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft

Other

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft placed intraoperatively for macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.

Primary outcomes

  1. Macular Hole Closure at 7 days

    Time frame: 7 day

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

  2. Macular Hole Closure at 1month

    Time frame: 1 month

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

  3. Macular Hole Closure at 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. BCVA at Day 7

    Time frame: 7 days

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at Day 7 after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

  2. BCVA at 1 Month

    Time frame: 1 month

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 month after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

  3. BCVA at 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 year after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kairat Ruslanuly, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+77019008387

Sanzhar Sambet, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+77758719834

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Network

Registry information

Official study title

Vitreoretinal Surgery for Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Comparative Study of Ten Techniques

Acronym: FTMH-10

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 26, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.