Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05199181

Full Pulpotomy in Mature Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis as a Routine Treatment in the Primary Care Clinics

The present study has the objective of being a first approach of the full feasibility study in order to find out whether the Full Pulpotomy performed by a general practice dentist in a primary care dental clinic at the public health system with limited armamentarium could be suitable and present an appropriate success rate as well as patient satisfaction.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

17 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro de Salud -La Negreta- Jurisdicción Sanitaria 1 del Estado de Querétaro

Querétaro, 76138, Mexico

About this study

The present study has the objective of being a first approach of the full feasibility study in order to find out whether the Full Pulpotomy performed by a general practice dentist in a primary care dental clinic at the public health system with limited armamentarium could be suitable and present an appropriate success rate as well as patient satisfaction. This information will help to decide if a multi-center non-randomized intervention designed study is carried out to determine if it is feasible to provide Full Pulpotomy as a routine treatment to symptomatic irreversible pulpitis or caries pulp exposure at the primary care dental clinics of the public health system in Mexico.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All the patients attending the primary care dental clinic with deep caries and/or pain in a permanent premolar or molar tooth.

  • Teeth with complete radicular growth.
  • Preoperative symptoms of irreversible pulpitis (Spontaneous pain or exacerbated by thermal stimuli and lasting for a few seconds to several hours interpreted as lingering pain compared with a control tooth and that could be reproduced using thermal testing)

Exclusion criteria

Medically comprised or pregnant patients.

  • Teeth exclusion criteria:
  • Pathological mobility
  • Sinus tract
  • Teeth that cannot be restored with amalgam
  • Radiographic internal or external resorption
  • Presence of apical rarefaction

Treatment and study plan

Full Pulpotomy

Procedure

After applying the rubber dam. Caries, and weak tissues were removed, and the endodontic access was prepared with a carbide bur. Most of the pulp was removed with a sterile high-speed diamond bur under sterile saline solution irrigation and amputated to the canal orifices level. Hemostasis was achieved by irrigation of the cavity with the same solution and an application of small cotton pellets for max.10 min. White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate was mixed according to the manufacturer´s instructions and was placed against the wound after successful hemostasis using an amalgam carrier and packed using an amalgam standard condenser. The material was adapted and a moistened cotton pellet was placed directly over the Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. After 15 minutes, the cotton was removed and the tooth was restored with amalgam. A postoperative radiograph was taken after restoration, general care instructions were given to the patients, and the recommendation of three analgesic intakes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment success rate

    Time frame: 1 Month follow-up

    To be considered successful, none of the following symptoms had to be present at one month follow-up: persistent pain, exaggerated tenderness to percussion, pathologic mobility, swelling, sinus track related to the treated tooth, evidence of periradicular radiolucency, furcal pathosis, or root resorption

  2. Treatment success rate

    Time frame: 3 Months follow-up

    To be considered successful, none of the following symptoms had to be present at three months follow-up: persistent pain, exaggerated tenderness to percussion, pathologic mobility, swelling, sinus track related to the treated tooth, evidence of periradicular radiolucency, furcal pathosis, or root resorption

  3. Treatment success rate

    Time frame: 6 Months follow-up

    To be considered successful, none of the following symptoms had to be present at six months follow-up: persistent pain, exaggerated tenderness to percussion, pathologic mobility, swelling, sinus track related to the treated tooth, evidence of periradicular radiolucency, furcal pathosis, or root resorption

  4. Treatment success rate

    Time frame: 9 Months follow-up

    To be considered successful, none of the following symptoms had to be present at nine months follow-up: persistent pain, exaggerated tenderness to percussion, pathologic mobility, swelling, sinus track related to the treated tooth, evidence of periradicular radiolucency, furcal pathosis, or root resorption

  5. Treatment success rate

    Time frame: 12 Months follow-up

    To be considered successful, none of the following symptoms had to be present at 12 months follow-up: persistent pain, exaggerated tenderness to percussion, pathologic mobility, swelling, sinus track related to the treated tooth, evidence of periradicular radiolucency, furcal pathosis, or root resorption

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with the effect of the treatment

    Time frame: 24 Hours

    Patients were contacted by phone to record the satisfaction with the effect of the treatment. The possible answers for their satisfaction level were: "Very satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", "Dissatisfied", or "Very dissatisfied".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rubén Domínguez Pérez

Other

Registry information

Official study title

An Approach Feasibility Study to Establish Full Pulpotomy in Mature Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis as a Routine Treatment in the Primary Care Dental Clinics of the Public Health System in Mexico

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 20, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 20, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.