Indiana University Bloomington
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
NCT Number: NCT05739994
The purpose of this study is to understand how the different regions of the brain affect our sense of limbs in space (proprioception) and in turn our hand movements (motor skill learning). This information might help us one day to generate better rehabilitation protocols to help patients with movement deficits.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
Moving our hands accurately, and learning new movement skills, depends on accurate sensory information. One of the sensory inputs which is crucial to make accurate movements is proprioception (sense of our limbs in space). Failure in estimating hand position results in inaccurate movement, raising the potential for accidents and injuries, but how the healthy brain carries out these functions, and how they could be strengthened in populations with sensory and motor deficits (e.g. stroke), is unknown. With greater understanding of these processes in the healthy brain, it may one day be possible to develop rehabilitation strategies that target a patient's unique mix of sensory and motor deficits.
A robust way to identify whether a brain region plays a role in a behavior is to temporarily modulate its excitability in healthy people using non-invasive brain stimulation. This is commonly done in research with a short sequence of low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), also known as repetitive TMS (rTMS). rTMS is used clinically to treat conditions such as depression and is considered very low risk provided the generally accepted screening criteria are met. In the research setting, this technique is widely used not only in healthy adults (as in this study) but also in children and people with concussion, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and more.
In separate groups of subjects, we will use rTMS over one of several brain regions of interest before the subject In separate groups of subjects, we will use a 40-second sequence of rTMS called continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over one of several brain regions of interest before the subject performs performs proprioceptive and skill learning tasks known to involve sensory and motor skill (learning). If performance of the task is affected by rTMS for a given group (relative to the sham, or control, group), it means that brain region plays some role in that type of proprioceptive or skill task.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Continuous theta burst TMS (cTBS) will be delivered to a location on the head. cTBS consists of 600 low-intensity TMS pulses delivered over 40 seconds in a pattern of 50 Hz triplets delivered at 5 Hz.
Continuous theta burst TMS (cTBS) will be delivered near the head, while an unplugged TMS coil is held at the vertex. No current will be induced in the head with this procedure.
Time frame: Assessed 4 times during the 2-hour main session: Pre-cTBS ("Pre"), immediately post-cTBS ("Post1"), after 40 trials of maze-tracing practice ("Post2"), and after 80 trials of maze-tracing practice ("Post 3").
Assessed by measuring movement accuracy on a maze-tracing task. Accuracy is defined by percent of movement path that falls within the maze. Participants traced the maze 10 times at 3 different speed ranges. Overall performance accuracy was taken as the mean accuracy across the three speed ranges. A change in mean accuracy reflects learning.
Time frame: Assessed at 2 timepoints during the 2-hour main session: pre-cTBS ("Pre") and post-cTBS ("Post").
Two-alternative forced choice task where the robot moves the participant's hand in two different positions, and the participant reports whether second position was closer or further than first position. This data is fitted with a logistic regression relating the distance between the two positions and the likelihood that participant reports "further". The outcome measure is the distance at which the participant is equally likely to say "closer" or "further"; this is defined as the point of subjective equality, which indexes proprioceptive accuracy. If the number is small (close to zero), it means the person has high proprioceptive accuracy. If the number is large, it means the person is less accurate.
Indiana University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07453043
Basic Science
Krakow, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07451782
Basic Science, Biomarker Discovery
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05124301
Basic Science
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06411860
Basic Science
Leeds, United Kingdom
View Trial Details