Hudiksvall municipality
Hudiksvall, Gävleborg County, 824 91, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT06893471
The goal of this project is to evaluate a practical method for improving systematic work environment management (SAM) by focusing on health-promoting factors rather than identifying risk-factors, and deficiencies. It will also explore how Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) can support goal-setting and evaluation within SAM. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Which health-promoting factors are prioritized, and what organizational-level initiatives are developed? * How does using GAS influence goal achievement related to health-promoting factors? * How do employees, managers, and HR representatives perceive the use of GAS? * What factors help or hinder the implementation of GAS and goal attainment?
Participants will:
Apply GAS within their organizations to set and evaluate goals Engage in a participatory process to identify key health-promoting factors Assess progress and the impact of interventions over time Researchers will analyze the effectiveness of GAS in enhancing SAM (experiment vs control group) and develop tools to support sustainable, healthy workplaces in the municipal sector.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hudiksvall, Gävleborg County, 824 91, Sweden
This project aims to test and evaluate a practical method for enhancing systematic work environment management (SAM), shifting the focus from identifying deficiencies to achieving goals centered on health-promoting factors. Competence supply is one of the greatest challenges for Swedish municipalities, and deficiencies in organizational and social work environments contribute significantly to sickness absence, poor mental health, and well-being. This issue threatens municipalities' ability to fulfill their responsibilities to citizens. Active systematic work environment management (SAM) has been identified as a potential solution, yet many municipalities rely on annual assessments focused on shortcomings, without providing indicators for concrete solutions, goal achievement, or measurable progress.
There is a lack of knowledge on how SAM should be designed to prioritize health-promoting factors (i.e., workplace conditions that support employee health and sustainable employment) at an organizational level. Additionally, there is a need for goal indicators that are motivating, measurable, and applicable at both unit and organizational levels.
To address these pressing needs, we propose applying the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) method. GAS serves as both a goal-setting and evaluation methodology, previously applied successfully at the individual level. We suggest that GAS can help organizations formulate concrete and tailored desired states related to specific interventions, thereby enhancing improvements in health-promoting factors.
GAS offers several advantages for enhancing SAM. First, goal-setting theory suggests that GAS facilitates the establishment of achievable and relevant goals. A participatory design is crucial, fostering a shared mental model of objectives. Second, GAS promotes data-driven decision-making and accountability within SAM, enabling workplaces to systematically assess progress and the impact of work environment initiatives. Third, GAS is versatile and universal, serving as a general framework adaptable to different organizations and their specific contexts and objectives.
The project will address the following research questions:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This study adapts Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) for group-level goal setting within systematic work environment management. Developed collaboratively with organizational stakeholders, the method is:
Tailormade - Allows flexibility in defining and scaling goals. Co-created - Encourages ownership and employee involvement. Standardized - Uses a five-level scale (-2 to +2) for tracking progress and enabling comparisons.
Data-driven - Includes a Progress Graph for systematic follow-up and documentation of goals and initiatives.
Managers in the experiment group will receive training before implementation begins
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 years
The results from the annual employee survey will be the primary outcome in this study.
The municipality uses e.g., HME index from Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR) and are developing specific items for measuring health factors built on research based questions.
Colquitt, 2001; COPSOQIII; Rawlins, 2008
Carless et al. 2000
Astvik et al. 2020; QPS Nordic
Astvik et al. 2020
Astvik et al. 2020; COPSOQIII; Semmer et al. 2007; Åkerblom et al. 2021
COPSOQIII; Singer et al. 2012; OSA
Berthelsen et al. 2020
COPSOQIII
Responses are rated on a five point (1-5) Likert-scale (higher score better outcome)
Karolinska Institutet
Other
From Annual Measurements to Daily Improvements: Evaluation of a Method for Improving Systematic Work Environment Management
Acronym: GAS for SAM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07417254
Behavior And Behavior Mechanism, Behavior Change
Dublin, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT07185828
Behavior Change Interventions, Disease Attributes
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715344
Behavior, Behavior Change Interventions
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07597603
Behavior, Behavior Change Interventions
Naples, Florida, United States
View Trial Details