Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01628627

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy

Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of transcutaneous frequency modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) to treat symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Paris-Nord University, Bondy, Ile Del France, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Diabetic neuropathy is a common and potentially disabling complication of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes due to the damage of peripheral nerves caused by chronic hyperglycemia. The most common clinical signs and symptoms of diabetic neuropathy include numbness, diminished sensation and painful symptoms, such as burning, pins and needles, intolerable pain and hyperaesthesia of the lower extremities.

Different classes of drugs, such as analgesics, antidepressants and anti-epileptics are variably efficacious in pain relief, but are unfortunately unable to revert the natural history of the disease.

A wide range of electrotherapies have been proposed for the non-pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathy. The rationale of using electric or magnetic stimulation is the potential enhancement of microcirculation and endoneural blood flow, possibly counteracting the nerve ischemic damage, together with other yet poorly understood mechanisms, such as masking pain by interfering with pain gate control.

A number of studies have reported the efficacy of different electrotherapies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), pulsed-dose electrical stimulation, peripheral nerve, nerve root, spinal cord, deep brain and epidural motor cortex stimulations, pulsed (electro-)magnetic fields and static magnetic fields, high-frequency external muscle stimulation, high-tone external muscle stimulation and external muscle stimulation. However, of all these electrotherapies, only TENS is currently recommended as a treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy by the American Academy of Neurology.

Recently, a novel transcutaneous frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (also named as Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulation System, FREMS), has been developed. FREMS consists of a sequence of modulated electrical stimuli that varies automatically in terms of pulse frequency, duration and voltage amplitude. FREMS was tested in a pilot randomized, cross-over study, and reduced diabetic neuropathy pain and ameliorated the sensory tactile and vibration perception threshold and motor nerve conduction velocity compared to a sham treatment.

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of FREMS in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling a large population with symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy, with repeated treatment sessions and a post-treatment follow-up of adequate length.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
  • Diabetes duration of > 1 year
  • Age: 18 to 75 years
  • Symptomatic neuropathy
  • Abnormal amplitude, latency or conduction velocity in at least one motor nerve (Tibial or Peroneal) or in the Sural Nerve
  • A measurable Sural Nerve conduction velocity
  • Stable glycemic control in the last 3 months, HbA1C < 11%
  • MDNS score > 7
  • Stable dose of analgesic medications, if any, in the month prior enrollment

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous treatment with TENS or other electrotherapy
  • Motor or Sensitive nerve conduction velocity < 30 non recordable/evocable
  • Unstable glycemic control during last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator or neurostimulator
  • Cancer diagnosed in the last 5 years
  • Psychological or psychiatric disorders that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with patient's compliance to study procedures
  • Active foot ulcer and/or major lower limb amputation
  • Diabetic mononeuropathy
  • Severe peripheral artery disease (Leriche Fontaine scale grade 3 and 4)
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.7
  • Uremic neuropathy or end-stage renal disease
  • Toxic neuropathies
  • Severe hepatic disease
  • Alcohol consumption ≥ 40 g/day or 30 units/week

Treatment and study plan

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) (Aptiva)

Device

FREMS consisted of sequences of biphasic (negative and positive), asymmetric and electrically balanced pulses, composed of: 1) an active phase of high negative voltage spike (variable, max -300 V) and extra short duration (variable, 10-100 μsec, mostly ~40 μsec); followed by: 2) a recharging phase of low voltage and long duration (0.9 - 999 msec); pulse frequency was variable, ranging 1 to 1,000 Hz, mainly in the low range 1-50 Hz. Three cycles of 10 consecutive (one a day for 5 days/week) applications to both lower limbs were delivered.

Other names: Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)

sham treatment (Aptiva)

Device

The sham treatment consisted of no electrical pulses delivered by the same device used to deliver the FREMS treatment and with the same treatment procedure and schedule.

Other names: Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal, Tibial, or Sural Nerve

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal , Tibial, or Sural Nerve at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Vibration Perception Threshold

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in Vibration Perception Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

  2. Change in Cold Sensory Threshold

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in Cold Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

  3. Change in Warm Sensory Threshold

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in Warm Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

  4. Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: baseline and week 3

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the first cycle of FREMS

  5. Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: week 17 and week 20

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the second cycle of FREMS

  6. Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: week 34 and week 37

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the third cycle of FREMS

  7. Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: baseline and week 3

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the first cycle of FREMS

  8. Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: week 17 and week 20

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the second cycle of FREMS

  9. Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: week 34 and week 37

    Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the third cycle of FREMS

  10. Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS)

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) at 51 weeks (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline

  11. Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline

  12. Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: baseline and 51 weeks

    Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lorenz Biotech S.p.A.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Long Term, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Multi-center Study of FRE.M.S.- Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation Lorenz Therapy™ in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jun 27, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.