Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01705587

Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study

This open label comparison study examines the hypothesis that teriparatide given immediately following repair of an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture will enhance healing and improve bone mineral density compared to delayed treatment (after six months) with teriparatide or no treatment with teriparatide (patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated). Patients with up-front teriparatide in addition will have greater quality of life measures and less pain compared to those with delayed or no therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University of Pittsburgh, Osteoporosis Prevention & Treatment Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

About this study

Up to 24 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more at any point prior to fracture and have sustained an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fracture will be enrolled. Subjects randomized to the two intervention arms will self-administer a daily SQ injection of the study medication for 12 months. The primary objective is to demonstrate greater radiologic evidence of healing at 10 weeks in patients on immediate teriparatide compared to those on delayed teriparatide who receive therapy six months after fracture. Secondary end points include (1) radiologic healing at 2, 6, 24, and 46 weeks; (2) increased bone density at 6 and 12 months as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, and femoral neck; (3) quality of life improvements at 10 weeks and 6 months as assessed by quality of life questionnaire and pain score; and (4) differences in biochemical markers of bone turnover in patient with upfront therapy compared to patients with delayed therapy and patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • postmenopausal women
  • with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more (all bisphosphonates will be included such as alendronate, risdedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid).
  • Patients will also be included if they are on glucocorticoids or other medications known to affect bone mineral metabolism as these are often found in patients with these types of fractures.
  • sustain an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture as defined by the the 2010 ASBMR task force. An atypical fracture must include all of the following: (1) a location in the femur distal to lesser trochanter; (2) no trauma or minimal trauma as a fall; (3) transverse or short oblique configuration; (4) noncomminuted; and (5) complete fracture extends through both cortices and may be associated with a medial spike; incomplete fractures involve only the lateral cortex. Patients who have an incomplete fracture can be included if they fall into the 2010 ASBMR task force definition.

Exclusion criteria

  • men
  • children
  • those who have had radiation therapy
  • Paget's disease
  • treatment with teriparatide for two year in the past
  • metastatic bone disease
  • active cancer
  • hypercalcemia
  • hyperparathyroidism
  • metabolic disease other than osteoporosis

Treatment and study plan

Teriparatide

Drug

20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection

Other names: Forteo

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

    Time frame: 6, 12 months of treatment

    The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.

  2. Radiologic Evidence of Healing

    Time frame: at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

    Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiologic Healing

    Time frame: at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

  2. Increased Bone Density

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 months

    Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck

  3. Quality of Life Improvements

    Time frame: at 12 months

    Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

  4. Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

    Time frame: intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

    upfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Susan L. Greenspan

Other

Collaborators

  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • University of Pittsburgh

Registry information

Acronym: FiX-IT

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 12, 2012
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.