Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02938286

Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Anesthetics III

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders

Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands

About this study

Rationale: In dermatology anesthetics are frequently injected or topically applied to achieve local anesthesia. Injectable anesthetics are effective but uncomfortable during administration, especially for people who are needle phobic. Application of topical anesthesia is painless but time consuming and often only partial aesthesia is achieved due to the barrier function of the stratum corneum. (Manuskiatti, Triwongwaranat et al. 2010) Penetration of local anesthetics could be enhanced by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional lasers (AFXL) which locally disrupts the stratum corneum by creating an array of microscopic ablation channels. (Sklar, Burnett et al. 2014) In a previous pilot study, conducted at our institute, we demonstrated that effective anesthesia could be achieved within ten minutes after application of a topical anesthetic on skin pretreated with AFXL at painless settings. (Meesters, Bakker et al. 2015) However, little is still known about the role of the type of fractional laser used (e.g. CO2 or Er:YAG laser), the laser settings, the type of anesthetic and the occlusion time on the efficacy of the anesthesia.

Objective: The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia.

Study design: Prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled, within subject, pilot study.

Study population: 15 healthy volunteers ≥18 years, who give written informed consent Intervention: In each subject, four test regions on subject's back of 1x1 cm will be randomly allocated to (I) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 5% density, (II) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 15% density, (III) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 5% density and (IV) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 15% density. After pretreatment, articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml + epinephrine 10 μg/ml 30 solution (AHES) will be applied on the test regions with 15 minutes occlusion time. After 15 minutes a pain stimulus, consisting of a pass with the fractional CO2 laser at 50 mJ and 5% density (scanned area 6x6 mm), will be given at each test region. In addition, a reference pain stimulus with the CO2 laser at the same settings will be given at unanesthetized skin. Subjects will be asked to indicate pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after each pain stimulus.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fitzpatrick skin type I or II
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • History of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation or complicated wound healing
  • Presence of any active skin disease
  • Known allergy to local anesthesia
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Incompetency to understand what the procedure involves
  • Current complaints of chronic pain or other alterations in pain sensation (e.g. due to diabetes mellitus or lepra)
  • Current treatment with systemic analgesics or other medication that can influence pain sensation
  • Current treatment with anticoagulants
  • Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI
  • Excessive sun tan

Treatment and study plan

Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 5% density

Device

Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 5% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

Other names: Fractional carbon dioxide laser, UltraPulse®, DeepFx handpiece; Lumenis Inc., Ablative fractional laser

Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 15% density

Device

Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 15% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

Other names: Fractional carbon dioxide laser, UltraPulse®, DeepFx handpiece; Lumenis Inc., Ablative fractional laser

Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 5% density

Device

Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 5% density.

Other names: Fractional Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser, P.L.E.A.S.E.® Professional; Pantec Biosolutions, Ablative fractional laser

Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 15% density

Device

Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 15% density.

Other names: Fractional Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser, P.L.E.A.S.E.® Professional; Pantec Biosolutions, Ablative fractional laser

Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density

Device

Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

Other names: Fractional carbon dioxide laser, UltraPulse®, DeepFx handpiece; Lumenis Inc., Ablative fractional laser

AHES

Drug

Topical application at test region I-IV under occlusion for 15 minutes

Other names: Ultracain D-S forte, Articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml + epinephrine 10 μg/ml

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    Time frame: After 15 minutes incubation time of the anesthetics

    The main study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    Time frame: Directly after pretreatment.

    The secondary study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after pretreatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders

Other

Collaborators

  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Registry information

Official study title

Parameters in Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Topical Anesthetics: Role of Laser Type and Laser Settings

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 19, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 29, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.