Northwestern University Department of Dermatology
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
NCT Number: NCT01186848
This was a prospective randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound when used in conjunction with 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser versus 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser alone for treatment of striae distensae(stretch marks).
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
The primary outcome measure by two dermatologists blindly compared the two areas of striae distensae on each side from live subjects using a questionnaire and quartile rating scale on the final follow-up visit.
This study was a pilot study designed to determine the feasibility of these procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
The secondary outcomes were qualitative measurements of the mean striae width in the treatment area before(week0) and after treatment(week10) and subject satisfaction was determined by a satisfaction questionnaire.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The contralateral side received the combination of micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side.
Time frame: week 10
The primary outcome was a blinded rating of the treatment area (Fractional Laser vs. Fractional Laser plus Intense Focused Ultrasound) with the best cosmetic appearance. Two dermatologists blindly evaluated the treated and control areas of each side from live subjects on the final follow up visit (week 10). This was reported as percentages of participants for whom "1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser" or "Micro-focused Ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated Laser" resulted in the "best cosmetic appearance".
Northwestern University
Other
Comparison of Fractional Photothermolysis Alone Versus Fractional Photothermolysis Plus Intense Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Striae Distensae: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05847530
Cicatrix, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05097157
Acne, Acne Scars
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02601105
Cosmetic Appearance of Stretch Marks, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01027793
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms, Signs and Symptoms
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
View Trial Details