Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
NCT Number: NCT07308860
Coronary artery disease, or narrowing of the blood vessels that provide blood to the heart, is the most common cause of death in the United States and can be treated with either coronary bypass surgery or coronary stent placement. This study will evaluate outcomes, including death and quality of life, at 10 years in 1,500 patients with coronary disease who have already been randomized to either bypass surgery or stenting.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in adults in the United States. In patients with 3-vessel CAD not involving the left main coronary artery, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) can improve outcomes. Older studies have shown that the more invasive option, CABG, significantly reduces mortality during long-term follow-up compared with PCI. However, these studies did not use contemporary methods to perform PCI, such as measuring an index called fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a coronary pressure wire or using current- generation drug-eluting stents (DES), both of which significantly improve outcomes after PCI. The Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial randomized 1,500 patients to FFR-guided PCI with current generation DES or to CABG and found that at 5 years there was no significant difference in the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke between the two strategies. There was a reduction in MI in the CABG group. Longer-term follow-up is critical to determine if contemporary PCI results in similar survival as CABG. The primary aim of this project is to determine if 10-year mortality is different after FFR-guided PCI compared with CABG. Investigators will perform 10-year follow-up in the 1,500 patients randomized in the FAME 3 trial to determine if FFR-guided PCI is non-inferior to CABG with respect to mortality. Secondary aims include assessing quality of life and angina relief at 10 years in the two groups. Additionally, investigators will compare individual rates of secondary clinical outcomes including MI, stroke, and repeat revascularization at 10-year follow-up after PCI or CABG.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
≥50% stenosis
Exclusion criteria
Coronary stenting compared with coronary bypass surgery
Coronary artery bypass surgery
Time frame: 10-year follow-up
The primary outcome is mortality or overall survival
Time frame: 10-year follow-up
Secondary aims include assessing quality of life at 10 years in the two groups utilizing the EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire.
Time frame: 10 year follow-up
Secondary aims include assessing angina status at 10 years in the two groups utilizing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire.
Time frame: 10 year follow-up
Additionally, we will compare individual rates of secondary clinical outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization and combinations of the above, including death and MI, and death, MI, or stroke at 10-year follow-up after PCI or CABG.
Stanford University
Other
Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Extended A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07432620
Angina Pectoris, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT00726921
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05704569
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT00005487
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial Details