Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01065779

FOSAMAX PLUS and FOSAMAX PLUS D Re-examination Study (0217A-267)

This survey is conducted for preparing application materials for re-examination under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Laws and its Enforcement Regulation, its aim is to reconfirm the clinical usefulness of FOSAMAX PLUS / FOSAMAX PLUS D through collecting the safety information according to the Re-examination Regulation for New Drugs.

Note: FOSAMAX PLUS D is known as FOSAMAX PLUS in several markets. FOSAMAX PLUS (70 mg/2800 IU) and FOSAMAX PLUS D (70 mg/5600 IU).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who are treated with FOSAMAX PLUS / FOSAMAX PLUS D within label for the first time

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants who have a contraindication to FOSAMAX PLUS / FOSAMAX PLUS D according to the current local label

Treatment and study plan

FOSAMAX PLUS

Drug

Patients with Osteoporosis treated with FOSAMAX PLUS (70 mg alendronate/2800 International Units (IU) Vitamin D). One tablet taken once weekly.

FOSAMAX PLUS D

Drug

Patients with Osteoporosis treated with FOSAMAX PLUS D (70 mg alendronate/5600 IU Vitamin D). One tablet taken once weekly.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to ~ 16 weeks and 14 days after treatment discontinuation

    Number of participants that experienced Serious Adverse events (SAE). There was no required routine visit scheduled for AE assessment. AEs were collected through participant self-reporting and assessed by investigators.

    SAEs were considered serious if the event resulted in:

    • death or was life-threatening
    • prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization
    • a persistent or significant disability/ incapacity
    • a congenital anomaly/ birth defect
    • a significant medical situation, other important medical event based upon appropriate medical judgment of the investigator
  2. Number of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to ~ 16 weeks and 14 days after treatment discontinuation

    Number of participants that experienced unexpected Adverse Events (AEs) regardless of whether or not the AE was considered related to the use of the product. There was no required routine visit scheduled for AE assessment. An AE was defined as any unfavorable & unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product. Any worsening (any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the product, was also considered an AE.

  3. Number of Participants With Non-Serious AEs

    Time frame: Up to ~ 16 weeks and 14 days after treatment discontinuation

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable & unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the product, was also considered an AE. There was no required routine visit scheduled for AE assessment. AEs were collected through participant self-reporting and assessed by investigators.

  4. Number of Participants With Improved, Unchanged, or Worsened Disease

    Time frame: Baseline and end of Treatment (Up to ~ 16 weeks)

    Evaluation of disease improvement was conducted in 3 categories of "improved", "unchanged", or "worsened". Changes in biochemical markers and vitamin D levels were reviewed before (baseline) and after treatment using statistical analyses to determine disease status, which was reported as either "improved", "unchanged", or "worsened".

  5. Change From Baseline in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at End of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to ~ 16 weeks)

    For efficacy evaluation, changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were evaluated before study drug administration and at end of study drug treatment. Change was calculated as the later time point (at ~16 weeks) minus the earlier time point (baseline). The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used. That is, the last observed non-missing value was used to fill in missing values at the later point in the study.

  6. Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin at End of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to ~ 16 weeks)

    For efficacy evaluation, changes in Serum Osteocalcin were evaluated before study drug administration and at end of study drug treatment. Change was calculated as the later time point (at ~16 weeks) minus the earlier time point (baseline). The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used. That is, the last observed non-missing value was used to fill in missing values at the later point in the study.

  7. Change From Baseline in Urine Deoxypyridinoline at End of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to ~ 16 weeks)

    For efficacy evaluation, changes in Serum Deoxypyridinoline were evaluated before study drug administration and at end of study drug treatment. Change was calculated as the later time point (at ~16 weeks) minus the earlier time point (baseline). The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used. That is, the last observed non-missing value was used to fill in missing values at the later point in the study.

  8. Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at End of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to ~ 16 weeks)

    For efficacy evaluation, changes in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase were evaluated before study drug administration and at end of study drug treatment. Change was calculated as the later time point (at ~16 weeks) minus the earlier time point (baseline). The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used. That is, the last observed non-missing value was used to fill in missing values at the later point in the study.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Organon and Co

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Re-examination Study for General Drug Use to Assess the Safety and Efficacy Profile of FOSAMAX PLUS and FOSAMAX PLUS D in Usual Practice

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Feb 9, 2010
Registry last updated
Feb 3, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.