Food as Medicine Study

Dietary quality is measured with the ASA 24-hour dietary recall (ASA 24) and the Diet Quality Index International (DQI-I). The ASA 24 is web-based tool that allows individuals to self-report all foods and beverages consumed in the previous 24 hours ((i.e., the data collection method). The DQI-I is a validated scoring system designed to assess overall diet quality (i.e., measure used to interpret the collected data). Used together, researchers will apply the DQI-I scoring algorithm to the nutrient and food group data collected from ASA 24 to generate a numeric DQI-I score that indicates the overall daily diet quality of the study participant. The DQI-I includes four components (variety 0-20; adequacy 0-40; moderation 0-30; overall balance 0-10) that contribute to a total score out of 100 points with higher scores indicating better diet quality. This allows us to track diet quality changes over time.

Dietary quality is measured with the ASA 24-hour dietary recall (ASA 24) and the Diet Quality Index International (DQI-I). The ASA 24 is web-based tool that allows individuals to self-report all foods and beverages consumed in the previous 24 hours ((i.e., the data collection method). The DQI-I is a validated scoring system designed to assess overall diet quality (i.e., measure used to interpret the collected data). Used together, researchers will apply the DQI-I scoring algorithm to the nutrient and food group data collected from ASA 24 to generate a numeric DQI-I score that indicates the overall daily diet quality of the study participant. The DQI-I includes four components (variety 0-20; adequacy 0-40; moderation 0-30; overall balance 0-10) that contribute to a total score out of 100 points with higher scores indicating better diet quality. This allows us to track diet quality changes over time.

The 6-item BRS uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). Items 1, 3, and 5 are positively worded, and items 2, 4, and 6 are negatively worded. The BRS is scored by reverse coding items 2, 4, and 6 and finding the mean of the 6 items. A higher score indicates a higher level of resilience.

The 6-item BRS uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). Items 1, 3, and 5 are positively worded, and items 2, 4, and 6 are negatively worded. The BRS is scored by reverse coding items 2, 4, and 6 and finding the mean of the 6 items. A higher score indicates a higher level of resilience.

The 10-item PSS uses a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Never, 1 = Almost Never, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Fairly Often, 4 = Very Often). PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, & 8) and then summing across all scale items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.

The 10-item PSS uses a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Never, 1 = Almost Never, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Fairly Often, 4 = Very Often). PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, & 8) and then summing across all scale items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.

The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey is a self-administered questionnaire that that includes 19 items across four functional support subscales: emotional/informational support (8 items), tangible/instrumental support (4 items), affectionate support (3 items), and positive social interaction (3 items). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert style scale (1 = None of the Time; 5 = All of the Time) to indicate how often that type of support is available to them. A score for each social support subscale can be computed by averaging across the individual items or by adding scores individual items together. Higher scores indicate more support.

The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey is a self-administered questionnaire that that includes 19 items across four functional support subscales: emotional/informational support (8 items), tangible/instrumental support (4 items), affectionate support (3 items), and positive social interaction (3 items). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert style scale (1 = None of the Time; 5 = All of the Time) to indicate how often that type of support is available to them. A score for each social support subscale can be computed by averaging across the individual items or by adding scores individual items together. Higher scores indicate more support.

The six-item standard measure from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service is modeled using information from the Community Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and American Community Survey. Food security status is assigned as follows: Raw score 0-1 - High or marginal food security (raw score 1 may be considered marginal food security, but a large proportion of households that would be measured as having marginal food security using the household or adult scale will have raw score zero on the six-item scale) Raw score 2-4 - Low food security Raw score 5-6 - Very low food security

The six-item standard measure from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service is modeled using information from the Community Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and American Community Survey. Food security status is assigned as follows: Raw score 0-1 - High or marginal food security (raw score 1 may be considered marginal food security, but a large proportion of households that would be measured as having marginal food security using the household or adult scale will have raw score zero on the six-item scale) Raw score 2-4 - Low food security Raw score 5-6 - Very low food security

Parental self-efficacy (PSE) refers to beliefs of parents to effectively engage in behaviors that result in desired outcomes for their children. The PDAP instrument measures PSE in relation to contextual circumstances, for example, psychological states and situational demands. Responses are made according to an 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 (not at all confident), 5 (moderately confident), and 10 (completely confident). A higher score indicates a higher level of PSE.

Parental self-efficacy (PSE) refers to beliefs of parents to effectively engage in behaviors that result in desired outcomes for their children. The PDAP instrument measures PSE in relation to contextual circumstances, for example, psychological states and situational demands. Responses are made according to an 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 (not at all confident), 5 (moderately confident), and 10 (completely confident). A higher score indicates a higher level of PSE.

The SEREB-C is a 14-item self-report tool designed to measure children's perceived self-efficacy to choose healthy eating behaviors in challenging contexts. The points of the individual items are summed to create a composite score ranging from 8 to 40 for the activation and temptation situations subscale and from 6 to 30 for the negative emotional situations subscale (combined, total score ranges from 14 to 70). Higher scores imply greater self-efficacy in regulating eating behaviors in challenging situations.

The SEREB-C is a 14-item self-report tool designed to measure children's perceived self-efficacy to choose healthy eating behaviors in challenging contexts. The points of the individual items are summed to create a composite score ranging from 8 to 40 for the activation and temptation situations subscale and from 6 to 30 for the negative emotional situations subscale (combined, total score ranges from 14 to 70). Higher scores imply greater self-efficacy in regulating eating behaviors in challenging situations.

The Mini-EAT (Eating Assessment Tool) is a dietary assessment tool designed to evaluate the quality of a person's diet. It ranges from a low of 36 to a high of 90. Scores are categorized into three levels: unhealthy (<61), intermediate (61-69), and healthy (69<)

The Mini-EAT is a dietary assessment tool designed to evaluate the quality of a person's diet. It ranges from a low of 36 to a high of 90. Scores are categorized into three levels: unhealthy (<61), intermediate (61-69), and healthy (69<)

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including body mass index (BMI) (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2).

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including body mass index (BMI) (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2).

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure data.

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure data.

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) data.

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) data.

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including alanine transaminase (ALT) data.

Child health outcomes will be evaluated with electronic health records, including alanine transaminase (ALT) data.