Birgith Engelst Grove
Herning, 7400, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT03847766
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate if PRO-based follow-up is at least as effective as usual outpatient follow-up in managing decline in renal function and maintaining patients' quality of life. Furthermore, we intend to characterize the target patient group that is suitable for PRO-based follow up in a group of patients suffering from renal insufficiency.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Herning, 7400, Denmark
This randomized controlled trial investigates the use of Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) follow-up among patients with chronic kidney disease. Usual outpatient follow-up visits will be replaced with diagnosis-specific electronic questionnaires filled in by the patient at home. Participants in the PRO-based follow up will complete a disease specific questionnaire every 3 months. Patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 40mL/min are randomized into three groups of follow-up
The aim of this study is to compare the effect on the clinical outcomes, the utilisation of resources, and patient-reported outcome in three types of follow-up in a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Diagnose specific questionnaires are used to screen patients in need of contact to the outpatient clinic
Other names: TelePRO
diagnose-specific questionnaires are used to support communication between clinician and patient during a phone consultation
Time frame: Measured at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation
Measurement for renal function
Time frame: 18 months after randomization
Overall mortality
Time frame: 18 months after randomization
Has the patient initiated dialyses during follow-up, Hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis
Time frame: 18 months after randomization
Has the patient received a kidney transplant during follow-up
Time frame: From baseline at 18 months after randomization
Difference in number of admissions
Time frame: 18 months after randomization
Number of contacts includes all contacts with the outpatient clinic in the study follow-up period
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomization
General health will be assessed by items from the SF-36 questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomization
Illness perception will be assessed by the Brief Illness perception questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomization
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention
Time frame: 6,12,18 months after randomization
Satisfaction will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society Patient reported experience measures PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Time frame: 6,12,18 months after randomization
Confidence will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Time frame: 6,12,18 months after randomization
Safety will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Time frame: Patient involvement will be measured at 6,12 and18 months
Patient involvement will be assessed by 5 questions from DEFACTUM (Central Denmark Region) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline questionnaires
All patients who met the inclusion criteria will be asked to fill in a questionnaire. The questionnaire will include Health Literacy (subscale 4,6,9), Selfefficacy, General Health (SF-36) and 5 renal specific symptoms (KDQOL), Patient activation (2+12), education and employment status. The purpose is to identify baseline differences between participants and non-participants and thereby testing the PRO system for generalizability.
University of Aarhus
Other
Tele Follow-up Using Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease - the PROKID Study
Acronym: PROKID
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03386539
Behavior, Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03938324
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06071143
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Daejeon, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05033652
Acute Kidney Injury, Chronic Disease
Alès, France
View Trial Details