Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03928938

Follow-up of Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy by Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes-tool

Electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) tools have improved survival and quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and in the follow-up of lung cancer patients. Current study investigates electronic patient reported outcome tool in the follow-up of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Current study aims to evaluate 1) patient reported symptoms and their severity, 2) Number of triggered alerts by the tool and their correlation to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival, 3) Correlation between different symptoms and the correlation of symptoms to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival,4) QoL of patients and correlation of changes in QoL to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival, 5) Patient compliance, 6) Correlation of baseline laboratory values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Docarates Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Please see the Brief summary

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent
  • Advanced cancers
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy initiated within +/- 2wks
  • Age >18y
  • ECOG 0-3
  • Patient compliant with the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy initiated > 2wks ago
  • General vulnerability affecting the participation in the trial
  • No internet access

Treatment and study plan

Electronic patient reported outcomes

Device

Electronic patient reported outcomes-tool

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the spectrum of patient reported symptoms

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Percentages of patient reported symptoms using KaikuHealth 17 symptom e-questionnaire. Individual questions evaluate the presence of a specific symptom e.g. nausea. Questions are answered yes or no.

  2. Change in Patient reported symptom severity

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Percentages of patient reported symptoms and their severity according NCI-CTCAE by KaikuHealth algorithm

  3. Change in the number of triggered alerts by the tool

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Number of triggered alerts by the tool and their correlation to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events in percentages or survival.

  4. Changes in Quality of Life according to QLQ-C30 Summary scores

    Time frame: At baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12weeks

    The correlation of the Summary score of QLQ-C30 to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, or other medical events or survival.

    The Core Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a validated cancer health-related quality-of-life questionnaire that includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).

  5. Correlation between changes in different symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events, or survival.

    Time frame: At 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation between different patient reported symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression or other medical events in percentages or survival.

  6. Changes in Patient compliance Questionnaire

    Time frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks

    Patient compliance using KaikuHealth e-questionnaire addressing usability (easiness to use from scale: very easy to very difficult; need of assistance to use the program: yes/no; how understandable are questions in symptom questionnaire from scale: totally agree to totally disagree) and user experience (use of the ePRO tool will better your cancer care: yes-no, do not know; use of the ePRO tool has been useful: yes-no-do not know; would you recommend the ePRO tool for cancer care: yes-no-do not know). Analysis is done on percentages of each answer choice at specific time point(s).

  7. Changes in patient compliance according to answering rate to symptom questionnaires

    Time frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks

    Patient compliance using response rates (within one week) to symptom questionnaires in percentages from sent requests

  8. Change in patient compliance according to answering rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    Time frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks

    Patient compliance using response rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaires (within one week) in percentages from sent requests. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).

  9. Correlation of change in baseline Hb values compared to control Hb values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation of change in baseline Hb values compared to control Hb values at specific timepoints to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

  10. Correlation of change in baseline leucocyte values compared to control leucocyte values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation of change in baseline leucocyte compared to control leucocyte values at specific timepoints to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

  11. Correlation of change in baseline lymphocyte values compared to control lymphocyte values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation of change in baseline lymphocyte values compared to control lymphocyte values at specific timepoints to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

  12. Correlation of change in baseline neutrophil values compared to control neutrophil values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation of change in baseline neutrophil values compared to control neutrophil values at specific timepoints to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

  13. Correlation of change in baseline CRP values compared to control CRP values to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

    Time frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

    Correlation of change in baseline CRP values compared to control CRP values at specific timepoints to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events or survival.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oulu University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 26, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.